Electric Force charge magnitude

AI Thread Summary
To find the magnitude of the second charge, the formula F = k(q1)(q2)/r^2 is used, where F is the force, k is Coulomb's constant, q1 is the first charge, and r is the distance between the charges. The calculation shows that q2 equals 25 nC when substituting the known values into the equation. The solution setup appears correct, and using nanoCoulombs (nC) is standard in charge measurements. The participant expresses uncertainty about using nano numbers, but this unit is commonly accepted in physics. The calculation confirms the second charge's magnitude as accurate.
Octoshark
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 1.0-C charge is 15 m from a second charge, and the force between them is 1.0 N.
What is the magnitude of the second charge?

Homework Equations



F = k(q1)(q2)/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



F = k(q1)(q2)/r^2 need to solve for q2 so...

F(r^2)/k(q1) = q2

1N(225m)/(9x10^9)(1C) = 25nC

That is correct, right? I just wasn't sure because this is on my sample exam, but we never used nano numbers during class so I wanted to double check.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Octoshark said:

Homework Statement



A 1.0-C charge is 15 m from a second charge, and the force between them is 1.0 N.
What is the magnitude of the second charge?

Homework Equations



F = k(q1)(q2)/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



F = k(q1)(q2)/r^2 need to solve for q2 so...

F(r^2)/k(q1) = q2

1N(225m)/(9x10^9)(1C) = 25nC

That is correct, right? I just wasn't sure because this is on my sample exam, but we never used nano numbers during class so I wanted to double check.
though i didn't actually calculate it, your setup looks right. nC is a common measure of charge.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top