Electric Force of Two Charges on Third Charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric force exerted on a third charge, q3, by two other charges, q1 and q2, located along the x-axis. The user initially calculated the total force as 1.65*10^-4 N, aligning with option A, while the answer key indicated option B as correct at 1.4*10^-4 N. There was confusion regarding the placement of charge q2, with the user assuming it was also on the x-axis, but later speculated that if q2 were on the y-axis, the force would be 1.38*10^-4 N. The discussion highlights the importance of charge positioning in electric force calculations. Ultimately, clarifying the coordinates of all charges is essential for accurate results.
physgrl
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1. Charge q1= 1.00*10^-9C is located +0.01 m from the origin along the x-axis. Charge q2= 2.00*10^-9C is located +0.03 m from the origin. What is the electric force exerted by these two charges on a third charge, q3= 1.5*10^-9C, located at the origin?

a. 1.65*10^-4N

*b. 1.4*10^-4N

c. 4.4*10^-4N

d. 6.1*10^-4N

Homework Equations



F=kq1q2/r^2
Ftotal=F1+F2...Fn

The Attempt at a Solution



both charges q1 and q2 exert a repelling force in the same direction with different magnitudes on charge q3

Ftotal=Fq1+Fq2
Ftotal=kq1q3/r1-32+kq2q3/r2-32
Ftotal=kq3((q1/r1-32)+(q2/r2-32))
Ftotal=9x109*1.5x10-9(1.0x10-9/(.01)2)+(2.0x10-9/(.03)2))
Ftotal=1.65x10^-4

the answer key says it is supposed to be B but I get A...what am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure that all three charges are located along the x-axis?
 
It doesn't specify, so I assumed since the first one is along the x-axis the second one is two.
 
physgrl said:
It doesn't specify, so I assumed since the first one is along the x-axis the second one is two.

Suppose, just for the sake of curiosity, that the second charge was located at y = +0.03m on the y-axis. What would the net force magnitude be on q3 at the origin?
 
1.38x10^-4 so it was supposed to say it was at the y axis
 
physgrl said:
1.38x10^-4 so it was supposed to say it was at the y axis

That would be my guess, yes.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top