What Happens When ω²LC=1 in an RLC Circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter whatisreality
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electric Impedance
AI Thread Summary
When ω²LC=1 in an RLC circuit, the inductive and capacitive reactances become equal and opposite, resulting in a net reactance of zero. This condition indicates resonance, allowing for maximum current oscillation at the resonant frequency without the need for additional voltage. The impedance at this point can appear as negative, which suggests a theoretical scenario that doesn't account for real-world losses. In practical terms, while the circuit can support large currents, it cannot operate losslessly due to inherent resistances. Understanding this resonance condition is crucial for analyzing RLC circuit behavior.
whatisreality
Messages
286
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider a circuit with a capacitor C in series an inductor of inductance L. Explain what happens when ω2LC=1, without calculations, using your knowledge and intuition.

Homework Equations


1/Z = 1/impedance = 1/(iωL) +1/(iωC)
i is pure imaginary.

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, unfortunately I have no intuition. I don't know what the quantity ω2LC represents, but it appears in the equation when you rearrange to find Z. So when I worked out Z, it was -1/(iωC+iωL) when the set condition is met. Which is a bit weird, because -ve resistance makes no sense...?
I've obviously gone wrong somewhere!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, a capacitor has impedance $$1\over j\omega C$$
Look here for some ideas
 
So when ω2LC=1 then the inductive and capacitive reactances are equal. The current is oscillating at the resonant frequency of the circuit?
 
That's right. Nothing wrong with your intuition.
Reactances are equal and opposite. So together they are 'zero'. ##\bf V = Z I## (bold face to mark them as complex): there can be huge currents shooting back and forth with 'no' voltage needed to whip them up. In reality you can't have a lossless system, so characteristics of an RLC circuit sneak in.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top