Electric potential and distribution of charge

AI Thread Summary
When two conducting spheres are connected by a wire, the charge redistributes until both spheres reach the same electric potential. The total charge in the system is 5 µC, which will be shared based on the surface areas of the spheres. The potential on the surface of the first sphere is calculated using the formula for electric potential, but the initial calculations yielded a potential of 44,937.8V, while the expected answer is around 112,000V. The discrepancy arises from the assumption of uniform charge distribution, which is incorrect; the potential must be equal on both spheres for equilibrium. Thus, the charge distribution must reflect the ratio of their surface areas to achieve this equal potential.
Lanza52
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A conducting sphere of radius r1 = 10 cm and charge q1 = 2 µC is placed far apart from a second conducting sphere of radius r2 = 30 cm and charge q2 = 3 µC. The two spheres are then connected by a thin conducting wire. What is the potential on the surface of the first sphere after the two spheres are connected by the wire? Use the reference V = 0 for r at infinity.


Homework Equations



Meh...

The Attempt at a Solution



A total of 5mC(using m for micro, not not milli) is in this system. When the wire is connected, the charge would distrbute evenly according given a surface charge density of 5mC/(area of sphere one + area of sphere two). So the charge on one would be (5mC/(area of 1+area of 2))(area of 1). And the voltage would be the line integral from infinity to 10x10^-2 of q/(4pie0r) dl)

I end up with 44,937.8V after all is said and done. But the "correct" answer is ~112,000V.

Going backwards from 112,100V, you get that V*4*pi*e0*r = Q from the line integral to find potential, or that the Q on the first sphere is 1micro coloumb. Which would require that the first sphere is 1/4 the area of the second sphere given a uniform charge distribution. Where as the area ratio is 1/9.5 or something close.

Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lanza52 said:

The Attempt at a Solution



A total of 5mC(using m for micro, not not milli) is in this system. When the wire is connected, the charge would distrbute evenly according given a surface charge density of 5mC/(area of sphere one + area of sphere two).

No. The charge will distribute between the spheres so that the potential of both spheres is the same. Otherwise the potential difference causes a driving force for the charges from one sphere to the other one.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top