Electric potential and kinetic energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum distance of approach between a fixed point charge Q and a moving charge q, given their respective values and initial speed. The conservation of energy principle is applied, equating the initial potential and kinetic energy to the potential energy at the minimum distance, where the final speed is zero. A participant questions the relevance of the initial distance r1, suggesting it can be dismissed as it approaches zero when far away. After calculations, the participant arrives at a minimum distance of 2*10^-11 meters, confirming the solution's correctness. The discussion emphasizes the application of energy conservation in electrostatics.
tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143

Homework Statement


A point charge Q is fixed in position, and a second object with charge q and mass m moves directly toward it from a great distance. If the initial speed of the object is v, compute the minimum distance between the two objects. If Q=1.0 μC, q=1.0 nC, m=1.0*105 kg, and v= 3.0*105m/s, what is the minimum distance of approach?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



\begin{array}{l}<br /> \frac{{kQq}}{{r_1 }} + \frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 = \frac{{kQq}}{{r_2 }} + \frac{1}{2}v_f^2 ,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,v_f = 0 \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \frac{{kQq}}{{r_1 }} + \frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 = \frac{{kQq}}{{r_2 }} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> r_2 = \frac{{kQq}}{{\left( {\frac{{kQq}}{{r_1 }} + \frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 } \right)}} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> r_2 = \frac{{8.99 \times 10^9 {\rm{N}} \cdot \frac{{{\rm{m}}^{\rm{2}} }}{{{\rm{C}}^{\rm{2}} }}1.0\mu {\rm{C}} \cdot 1.0{\rm{nC}}}}{{\left( {\frac{{8.99 \times 10^9 {\rm{N}} \cdot \frac{{{\rm{m}}^{\rm{2}} }}{{{\rm{C}}^{\rm{2}} }}1.0\mu {\rm{C}} \cdot 1.0{\rm{nC}}}}{{r_1 }} + \frac{1}{2}1.0 \times 10^{ - 5} \cdot 3.0 \times 10^5 } \right)}} \\ <br /> \end{array}

This reminds me somewhat of gravity's escape velocity problem, where your final distance is irrelevant as long as it is large (theoretically infinity).

How do I dismiss r1, the initial starting position in this problem? Can I just get rid of the entire first term in the denominator, since when r1 is large, it approaches 0?

Thanks!

**edit, 3*105 should be (3*105)2. I get 2*10-11 meters for the answer. Did I do this right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer is correct.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top