Electric potential and magnitude

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving electric potential and electric field related to a point charge. The initial electric potential is given as 4500V and the electric field as 2.3x10^5N/C. To find the distance r, the equation r = kq/V is suggested, where k is a constant. Participants advise that instead of calculating the charge q first, one can use the ratio V/E to simplify the problem. The second part of the problem involves calculating the electric potential and field at a distance of r/4, which can also be approached without finding q.
blee22
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You start at a distance r from a point charge. The electric potential is 4500V at that point, and the electric field is 2.3x105N/C. a) What is r? b) What is the electric potential and magnitude of the electric field at a distance of r/4?

Homework Equations


v= kq/r E=kq/r^2 substitute everything and get q= v^2/kE?

r=kq/v

solve for q which will then allow you to solve for r?

The Attempt at a Solution



V = 4500, k = 8.9x10^9 and E = 2.3x10^5 that will give us a q

This q will then be put into the equation r=kq/v and that will give you the answer for a?

Part b would you take that distance solve for the magnitude and e-field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF! Your outline of a solution should work. However, you don't actually need to find q first. Consider the ratio V/E.
 
TSny said:
However, you don't actually need to find q first. Consider the ratio V/E.
He will, however, eventually solve for q, but I would suggest to solve it after you find r. And yes, you would just plug in the values you get into the equations to do part b (but use r/4 instead of r).
 
Isaac0427 said:
He will, however, eventually solve for q, but I would suggest to solve it after you find r. And yes, you would just plug in the values you get into the equations to do part b (but use r/4 instead of r).
If you think about how V and E depend on r, you can answer part (b) without knowing the charge. Of course there is nothing wrong with finding q if you want.
 
  • Like
Likes Isaac0427
TSny said:
If you think about how V and E depend on r, you can answer part (b) without knowing the charge. Of course there is nothing wrong with finding q if you want.
Ah, I see what you are talking about.

OP: using this strategy will take away most of the calculations you think you need to do.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top