Electric Potential due to two charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the points along a horizontal line where the electric potential is zero due to two point charges: +3.0 μC at x = 0 m and -4.0 μC at x = 2 m. The calculation shows that the electric potential is zero at x = 6/7 m, which is the only point identified within the segment between the charges. However, further exploration suggests considering points outside this segment, particularly to the left of the positive charge, which could yield additional solutions. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly defining distances as positive values and using absolute values in calculations. Ultimately, the consensus is that while the primary solution is at 6/7 m, there may be other potential points to consider.
Mnemonic
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two point charges are placed on a horizontal line, the first is +3.0-μC located at x = 0.0-m, y = 0.0-m and the second is -4.0-μC located at x = 2.0-m, y = 0.0-m. At what points on the horizontal line y = 0.0 will the electric potential be zero?

Homework Equations


V(r)=kq/r

The Attempt at a Solution


V(total)=kq1/r1+kq2/r2=0

k(q1/r1+q2/r2)=0

k(3e-6/x-4e-6/(2-x)=0

x=6/7

So there should be no electric potential at x=6/7metres. Is that the only point?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mnemonic said:

Homework Statement


Two point charges are placed on a horizontal line, the first is +3.0-μC located at x = 0.0-m, y = 0.0-m and the second is -4.0-μC located at x = 2.0-m, y = 0.0-m. At what points on the horizontal line y = 0.0 will the electric potential be zero?

Homework Equations


V(r)=kq/r

The Attempt at a Solution


V(total)=kq1/r1+kq2/r2=0

k(q1/r1+q2/r2)=0

k(3e-6/x-4e-6/(2-x)=0

x=6/7

So there should be no electric potential at x=6/7metres. Is that the only point?

Your work looks correct . Yes, there is only one point at which potential is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes Mnemonic
Mnemonic said:
k(q1/r1+q2/r2)=0
k(3e-6/x-4e-6/(2-x)=0
Not quite correct --- you'll want to look at how you've defined "r2."
 
Would I get another valid answer if I first used:

k(3e-6/x-4e-6/(2-x)=0

then used:

k(3e-6/(2-x)-4e-6/x=0
?
 
Mnemonic said:
Would I get another valid answer if I first used:

k(3e-6/x-4e-6/(2-x)=0

then used:

k(3e-6/(2-x)-4e-6/x=0
?

No . The answer would remain same i.e point of zero potential will be at a distance (6/7)m from +3.0-μC .

In the latter case ,you are taking 'x' to be the distance of point of zero potential from -4.0-μC .Here you will get x=(8/7)m .Again this point will be at a distance (2-x) i.e (6/7)m from +3.0-μC .

The answer remains same .
 
  • Like
Likes Mnemonic
You have two charges, opposite in sign, separated by a distance of two meters; at all points on the two meter line segment between those two opposite sign charges there is a non-zero force on any non-zero test charge resulting from the simultaneous attraction and repulsion of the test charge by the two given charges.
 
@Mnemonic ,

There is something more you need to do . There might be another solution to this problem.

Consider a point to the left of +3.0-μC at a distance 'x' . Apply the appropriate condition , as you did in the OP .What do you get ?
 
  • Like
Likes Mnemonic
Mnemonic said:

Homework Equations


V(r)=kq/r

The Attempt at a Solution


V(total)=kq1/r1+kq2/r2=0

k(q1/r1+q2/r2)=0

k(3e-6/x-4e-6/(2-x)=0

Remember, r is the distance from the charge, a positive quantity. x is the position along the x axis. If x is positive, 2-x can be both positive and negative, You need to take the absolute value. x can be also negative. So you have to take the absolute values r1=|x|, r2=|2-x|.
 
Back
Top