Electric Potential Energy Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a student's confusion regarding the calculation of electric potential energy in a three-charge system. The student initially calculated the total electric potential energy as -0.24 J using the formula E=(kq1q2)/r but received a different answer of -0.12 J from the teacher. A suggestion was made to simplify the problem by analyzing it as a two-charge system and calculating the work done in bringing each charge from infinity. The student found this method effective and resolved their misunderstanding. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying concepts in electrostatics to avoid calculation errors.
leaf345
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi, this is my first time posting here but I have a question that looked really simple at first, but the answer I get is wrong from the answer given to us by our teacher.
The question is this:
Consider the diagram below
http://img485.imageshack.us/img485/9282/physics3bn.jpg

a) What is the electric potential energy of the system?
What I did
3x10^-6=q1
1x10^-6=q2
-2x10^-6=q3

Epotental(total)= (Epotential @ q1) + (Epotential @ q2) + (Epotential @ q3)
=[(kq1q2)/0.36 + (kq1q3/0.36)] + [(kq2q1/0.36) + (kq2q3/0.4)] + [(kq3q1/0.36) + (kq3q2/0.4)]

I used the formula E=(kq1q2)/r to get the potential energies at all 3 points and then added them together. I got -0.24 J but the answer the teacher gave us is -0.12J. Is it possible he is mistaken, or am I oversimplifying this question?

BTW: This is grade 12 physics
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try applying this method to a two-charge system and see if you can figure out what you're doing wrong. Here's how I would do a problem like this: I'd "move" one charge in from an infinite distance and calculate the work done, which is zero. Then I'd bring in the second and fix it in place and calculate the work done. Then I'd bring in the third charge, etc.
 
I tried what you recommended in your second part and it worked :)
Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top