Electric Potential : First concepts

AI Thread Summary
To accelerate an electron to 39.0% of the speed of light from rest, a potential difference of approximately 44.0 kV is required when accounting for relativistic effects. The non-relativistic calculation yields a potential difference of about 38.9 kV. The kinetic energy equations used include K = mv²/2 for non-relativistic and Ek = (γ-1)mc² for relativistic scenarios. The charge of the electron and the potential energy change are crucial in determining the required voltage. Understanding these concepts is essential for solving problems related to electric potential and kinetic energy in physics.
mitleid
Messages
56
Reaction score
1
I submitted this last night, but for some reason it didn't go through... so I don't have time to make it as awesome as I had before.

Through what potential difference would an electron need to be accelerated for it to achieve a speed of 39.0% of the speed of light, starting from rest?

C = 3.00 x 10^8
M(e-) = 9.11x10^-31
abs(e) = 1.60x10^-19 [I have been using this value as q)

Ka + Ua = Kb + Ub where K is kinetic energy and U is the potential. Ka = 0 and the equation can be simplified to something like -Kb = Ub - Ua.

I have all the variables for Kb as well as the charge. What I worked things down to last night was along the lines of Kb/q = (Ub/q - Ua/q) = \DeltaV. The units worked out (I'm pretty certain) and I got a reasonable answer in kV, something like 39.0kV.

Apologies for the lack of depth here, I actually have to run off to my physics class! Any help is appreciated, thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
Physics news on Phys.org
The work done on the electron by the field is q⋅ΔU and this work will increase the kinetic energy of the electron. Now the problem stated that it started at rest, so q⋅ΔU = mv2/2 non-relativistically.

This gives you 38.9 kV

For the relativistic answer, you need to use Ek = (γ-1)mc2 where γ = (1-(v/c)2).

This gives you 44.0 kV
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top