Electric potential inside non-conducting sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric potential inside a non-conducting sphere with a given radius and charge. Participants clarify that the electric field inside the sphere is zero due to Gauss's Law, leading to no potential difference between points inside the sphere. A formula for potential is provided, indicating that it varies based on the reference point chosen for V=0. The conversation also touches on potential at the surface of the sphere and the implications of different reference points for calculating electric potential. Overall, the key takeaway is understanding how to apply Gauss's Law to determine electric potential in non-conducting materials.
irnubcake
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A nonconducting sphere has radius R = 3.71 cm and uniformly distributed charge q = +3.76 fC. Take the electric potential at the sphere's center to be V0 = 0. What is V in volts at radial distance (a) r = 1.00 cm and (b) r = R?


Homework Equations



I suppose:
Electric field of spherical shell = ( 1 / (4 x pi x E) ) * ( q / r² )

The Attempt at a Solution



Completely stuck, don't even know where to begin > <.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
we have by gauss law (im using cgs): E=Q/r^2
the direction is radial, so you have a differential equation of dV/dr=Q/r^2, you know to solve this don't you?
 
I have a question: I have a nonconducting sphere with a 0.06m radius with a 2*10^-8 C charge inside. I need to find V at a 0.03m radius.

From MathematicalPhycisist I have to find (using Gauss) how the electric field varies with distance. According to him its: E = Q/r^2. I am using the IS units i don't know how that changes Gauss' equation: E.da= dq/E0. So I replace E with its equivalent function: E= Q/r^2. in the differential equation: dV = E dr ---> dV = (Q/r^2) dr. I integrate to find the potential V and I get -Q(1/r) and I plug in 0.03m where the "r" is. I already have the answer to the problem and this way to solve the problem does not match with answer which is: 6.18 * 10^3 V. Can somebody please help me?
 
MathematicalPhysicist said:
we have by gauss law (im using cgs): E=Q/r^2
the direction is radial, so you have a differential equation of dV/dr=Q/r^2, you know to solve this don't you?

I'm afraid that's a little unrelated, MathematicalPhysicist.
That may be the form that Gauss' Law gives you for r>R, but inside the spherical shell, there is no charge, and therefore Gauss' Law gives you 0 field inside, and r <= R is what the question is asking.

Since the difference in potential is the path integral of the E field, you find 0 difference in potential between any two points inside the spherical shell.

The potential on the very edge of the shell is an interesting question though... My intuition tells me it's 0, but I'm finding it hard to convince myself that is the case...

(Oh, the question may have been poorly phrased, with r standing for the radial distance from the surface of the shell, rather than from its center. If that is the case, then MathematicalPhysicist's advice is spot-on)
 
I've been searching the internet for the solution and I've found a pretty good .pdf explaining how its supposed to be solved. Link:http://iweb.tntech.edu/murdock/books/v4chap4.pdf".

Depending at where your reference point V=0 is, the way to solve this problem may change. If your reference point is at a distance infinity the solution is:

(1/4*pi*Eo) * q(3R^2-r^2)/(2*R^2);

Where the first part of the equation corresponds to the electric constant, k. q is the charge inside the non conductive sphere, R is the radius of the sphere (from the center to the surface), and r is the distance from the center to the point where you want to measure V.

I haven't found the answer when its a shell. But in this its a solid sphere, and at the surface V is:

(1/4*pi*Eo) * q(R^2);

Well I hope this helps.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top