Electric potential problem with two plates and different points (i'll elaborate)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential at points R and S between two parallel plates with different potentials. The left plate is at +60 Volts, while the right plate is at 0 Volts, with point R positioned midway and point S 2.0mm from the right plate. The initial attempt to calculate the potential at point R incorrectly included the voltage of the left plate without accounting for the reference point being the right plate. The correct approach involves using the distance from the right plate to determine the potential, while also considering the influence of the charge at point P. The concept of electric potential is clarified, emphasizing that the reference point for zero potential is the right plate, not infinity.
nadeem0322
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There are two parallel plates. The plate on the left has an electric potential of +60 Volts. The right plate has an electric potential of 0 Volts. The plates are 8.0mm apart. Between the two plates lies a point P 2.0mm from the left plate with a charge -3.5pC. Point R lies a mass right in the middle. Point S lies 2.0mm from the right plate.

A)
i) What is the electric potential at point R?
ii) What is the electric potential at point S?

Point R lies a mass of 4*10^-19 kg with a charge -2pC.
B) What is the speed of the mass at R when it reaches point S if it has an initial velocity of 3.0*10^4 m/s.

Homework Equations


V= kq/r
u=kqq/r



The Attempt at a Solution



I solved this problem for Ai) using kq/r where r is the distance from R and P and q is charge at P. I then added the voltage of 60 volts to that number to get the total potential. I believe this is where I went wrong but I don't see how the 60 voltage plate could not affect the potential at the point. Any help would be great. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the potential of the RH plate is zero then the potential at a point x away from the RH plate towards the LH plate is 60V*x/d, x = distance from RH plate to R or S, ignoring the extra charge at P. Now the potential due to the extra charge at P is just the extra work you have to apply to a unit positive test charge to bring it from the RH plate to R or S.

The usual definition of potential as being the work on a unit test charge brought from infinity to the observation point does not apply here. That's because the point of zero potential is the RH plate and not infinity.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top