Electric Potential vs Electric Field?

AI Thread Summary
Electric fields are vector quantities, meaning their components can cancel out when symmetrically arranged, while electric potential is a scalar that sums contributions from all sources. Confusion arises in homework questions regarding when potential adds up versus when components cancel. In the case of a uniformly charged semicircular rod, the potential at the center is calculated by integrating contributions from each point, disregarding directional components. The discussion emphasizes that potential does not have "y components" to consider, as it is not a vector. The thread concludes by noting that such questions should be directed to a homework forum for further assistance.
Sergio
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've read that in an electric field due to it being a vector if its mirrored symmetrically the components cancel out. However, the electric potential is a scalar so the components are added not canceled out. This is consistent with one question in my physics H.W., but not for another question. So I'm very confused as to when electric potential cancels out and when it sums up.

The question where it is consistent that the electric potential adds up is # 25.47 here:
http://web.unbc.ca/~hussein/Phys_111_Winter_2005/Selected_Ch25.pdf

However for the following question the y components cancels out according to the answer.

Q.) A uniformly charged insulating rod of length 14.0 cm is bent into the shape of a semicircle as shown in Figure P25.44. The rod has a total charge of 27.50 mC. Find the electric potential at O, the center of the semicircle.

This is figure 25.44 http://www.webassign.net/serpop/p19-21.gif
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no "y component" of the potential since it's a scalar. You just add together or integrate the potential from each source point.
 
Khashishi said:
There is no "y component" of the potential since it's a scalar. You just add together or integrate the potential from each source point.

So you always completely disregard 'y' ? Seems wrong.
 
Sergio said:
So you always completely disregard 'y' ? Seems wrong.
No, there is no "y component" to disregard, because there is no "y component" to start with. The potential is a scalar, not a vector with x and y components.

Anyway, this a homework-type problem, so it will have to be posted in the homework forum, with an attempt at a solution.

Thread closed.
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top