Electric Potential vs Electric Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion between electric potential and electric potential energy in the context of an electron moving in an electric field. When an electron is released in a downward electric field and moves upward, its electric potential energy decreases, which seems counterintuitive since it moves to a higher electric potential. The key point is that because the electron has a negative charge, a decrease in electric potential energy corresponds to an increase in electric potential. This relationship highlights that the signs of potential energy and potential change are opposite for negative charges. Ultimately, understanding this concept clarifies how a loss in energy can lead to a higher potential for negatively charged particles.
Alex Hughes
Messages
54
Reaction score
13
So in my physics textbook a problem is stated. We are given an external electric field directed downwards of 150N/C. We are then told that an electron is released in the electric field and it moves upwards 520m. Finally we are asked to calculate the change in electric potential energy of the released electron and through what potential change does it move. I understand the math behind the problem, the amount of work = -(change in electric potential energy). Since work is (force * distance) and in an electric field the force is (q*E), to find the change in electric potential energy it becomes -(qEdcos(theta)). They find the answer and the change in electric potential energy of the electron is said to have DECREASED by a certain amount. Then to find the change in electric potential, they divide by the charge of the electron and say the electric force does work to move the electron to a HIGHER potential. That's where I'm confused. How can the electric potential energy decrease, but move to a higher potential. Am i not understanding the definition of each term? Please somebody help, I'm so confused. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And like I said, I understand the math behind it, I'm just trying to understand it conceptually. Obviously the potential is higher because the electric potential energy is negative and you divide by the charge of an electron which is also negative, giving you a positive value. But conceptually it doesn't make sense to me that a LOSS in energy results in a HIGHER potential.
 
Since the charge is negative the change in potential energy will always have the opposite sign of the change in potential.
 
Dale said:
Since the charge is negative the change in potential energy will always have the opposite sign of the change in potential.
So, if the charge was positive, the change in potential energy would have the same sign as the change in potential?
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
Alex Hughes said:
So, if the charge was positive, the change in potential energy would have the same sign as the change in potential?
Yes, exactly
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top