Electric Potential within coaxial cylinder

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric potential in a system of coaxial cylinders, specifically for regions inside and outside the cylinders. The potential for r < a is derived as [(lambda)/(2(pi)(epsilon))]*[ln(b/a)], with the reference point at radius b. There is confusion regarding the integration limits, as the potential inside the smaller cylinder is questioned, particularly if it should be integrated from b to 0 instead. It is clarified that the electric field inside a conductor is zero, indicating that the potential remains constant within the hollow conductor at equilibrium. The distinction between the inner cylinder being a metal and its conductive properties is also addressed, emphasizing that being metal typically implies it behaves as a conductor.
electrifice
Messages
37
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A long metal cylinder with radius a is supported on an insulating stand on the axis of a long, hollow metal tube with radius b. Thew positive charge per unit length on the inner cylinder is \lambda, and there is an equal negative charge per unit length on the outer cylinder. Calculate the potential for r < a; a < r < b; r > b.


Homework Equations


EA=q/epsilon
Va - Vb = \intE.dl


The Attempt at a Solution


I really just need help figuring out why the answer for when r < a is:
[(lambda)/(2(pi)(epsilon))]*[ln(b/a)]
The reference point here is b. If we are looking for the potential INSIDE the smaller cylinder with radius a, then why are we only integrating from b to a? Shouldn't it be from b to 0? Or is the potential inside the smaller cylinder constant? Why would that be?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Or is the potential inside the smaller cylinder constant? Why would that be?

Well what IS the potential inside a hollow conductor at equilibrium? The electric field is zero, right? so...
 
The smaller cylinder is not hollow and I don't think its a conductor (and its supported on an insulating stand anyway)... unless being "metal" is synonymous with conductor? E inside a conductor is 0, but I don't think the smaller cylinder is a conductor.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top