Electric Potential-Work Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter scoldham
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electric
AI Thread Summary
To determine the work required to bring a charge Q from infinity to a point near two fixed charges, one must calculate the electric potential at that point due to both fixed charges. The potential at the point is the sum of the potentials from each charge, which can be found using the formula for electric potential. The work done is then given by W = Q * ΔV, where ΔV is the potential difference between the point and infinity, with the potential at infinity set to zero. It is essential to remember that the work done by the electric field is negative of the work done by the external force moving the charge. This approach effectively simplifies the calculation of work in electric fields.
scoldham
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Referring to the figure attached, how much work must be done to bring a particle, of charge Q = +16e and initially at rest, along the dashed line from infinity to the indicated point near two fixed particles of charges q1 = +4e and q2 = -2e?

Distance d = 1.40 cm, theta 1 = 43 degrees, and theta 2 = 60 degrees.

Homework Equations



E = \frac{kQ}{r^2}

v = Ed = \frac{Fd}{q} = \frac{w}{q}

The Attempt at a Solution



I've solved for the net E field produced by the 2 still charges. My thought is that I would plug in the magnitude of that value into Ed = \frac{w}{q} along with the charge from the moving particle and that would produce a value for w... But, I do not know what to use for distance... how do I handle the infinity... with a limit?

Help appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Electric Potential-Work Problem.png
    Electric Potential-Work Problem.png
    2 KB · Views: 734
Physics news on Phys.org
The work must be done to bring the charge Q from infinity (where potential is supposed to be zero) to some point in space is Q times the potential of the electric field in this point (say point A). All you need to do is to find the potential due to q_1 and q_2 in A. From attached picture you know the distances from q_1 and q_2 to A, so it's easy to find the potential due to each of charge and then add them to find the total potential. Note also that the work done by the electric field when YOU are moving the charge in it is MINUS the work perfomed by YOU.
 
I'm not sure I understand,

Are you saying that

q_1 E_{net} = v_1

and that the same is true for q2 and v2... so,

v_1+v_2 =\Delta V

Therefore

w = Q \Delta V
 
I'm saying that the work done is
W = - Q \int_{\infty}^{A} \mathbf{E} \mathbf{dl} = Q \left[ \varphi(A) - \varphi(\infty) \right]
If you set \varphi ({\infty) = 0 (remember that potential is only defined up to an additive constant) then
W = Q \varphi (A)
where
\varphi (A) = \varphi_{q1} + \varphi_{q2}
that is the sum of two potentials due to each of the charge.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top