Electrical Attraction and Repulsion Related to Distance?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of electrostatic forces, specifically the distances at which unlike-charged ions stop attracting and start repelling, as well as the conditions under which neutrally charged atoms begin to repel each other. Participants explore theoretical and experimental aspects of these phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that electrostatic attraction and repulsion are continuous phenomena, with no specific distance at which these forces switch from attraction to repulsion.
  • Others argue that while unlike charges attract, there must be a limit to this attraction, suggesting that at a certain distance, repulsive forces come into play.
  • A participant mentions the Lennard-Jones potential as a model that describes the balance of attractive and repulsive forces between atoms, indicating that there is an equilibrium point where the net force is zero.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the existence of a distance at which unlike charges stop attracting, questioning the validity of the original premise.
  • Some contributions reflect personal speculation and a desire for clarification on the topic, indicating a mix of understanding and confusion regarding the complexities of atomic interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus, with multiple competing views on the nature of electrostatic forces and the distances involved. Some assert that attraction and repulsion are continuous, while others suggest there are specific distances where these forces change character.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of consensus on the definitions of attraction and repulsion in the context of distance, as well as the complexity of atomic interactions that may not be fully addressed in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying electrostatics, molecular dynamics, or anyone curious about the forces at play between charged and neutral particles in physics.

Nano-Passion
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
0
At what distance do unlike-charged ions stop attracting and start repelling? (I assume it can not keep attracting forever, unless outside force is applied to it).

At what distance do neutrally charged atoms start repelling each other? (Some momentum carrying them toward each other)

I've looked around and can't seem to find the answer to this. So in the premise that there is no answer:

Can we design an experiment to figure this out?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer is that you are looking at the phenomenon of electrostatic forces from a wrong perspective. There is no special distance at which attraction or repulsion sets in. They are continuous phenomena - like-charged ions always repel and unlikes always attract, regardless of the distance separating them. The role that distance plays is in affecting the strength of attraction/repulsion between them (specifically, the magnitude of the force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the particles).
You may wish to read up on Coulomb's law for more details.
 
Fightfish said:
The answer is that you are looking at the phenomenon of electrostatic forces from a wrong perspective. There is no special distance at which attraction or repulsion sets in. They are continuous phenomena - like-charged ions always repel and unlikes always attract, regardless of the distance separating them. The role that distance plays is in affecting the strength of attraction/repulsion between them (specifically, the magnitude of the force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the particles).
You may wish to read up on Coulomb's law for more details.

I'm sorry, what I really mean is:

At what distance do unlike-charged ions stop attracting and start repelling? (I assume it can not keep attracting forever, unless outside force is applied to it).

At what distance do neutrally charged atoms start repelling each other? (Some momentum carrying them toward each other)
 
Nano-Passion said:
I'm sorry, what I really mean is:

At what distance do unlike-charged ions stop attracting and start repelling? (I assume it can not keep attracting forever, unless outside force is applied to it).

I don't think I'm aware of any such phenomenon. Unlike charges always attract no matter how far apart they are.
Please tell us where you got this information from as it is probably wrong (unless a verified research paper).
 
mishrashubham said:
I don't think I'm aware of any such phenomenon. Unlike charges always attract no matter how far apart they are.
Please tell us where you got this information from as it is probably wrong (unless a verified research paper).

All in my head. Just some speculation and imagination.

You misunderstand me, what I am NOT saying is how far they have to be to repel. But how close do they have to get to start repelling.

Though as I ponder this phenomena I have realized that it probably is only exclusively reserved for neutrally charged atoms. Certainly at one point it stops following its' momentum and would collide with another object. We don't fall into our chair for a reason, but it repels us.

Just some speculation, I encourage you to correct or argue against me.
 
Last edited:
If unlikes never had a certain distance in which they repelled, they would ultimately coalesce. But certainly there is a force that keeps them from doing that. They don't attract indefinitely, but definitely at to a certain point. That distance is what I would like to figure out.

Feel free to correct my reasoning.
 
I get what you mean now. You are mainly interested in molecular dynamics, of the attraction and repulsion between atoms/molecules.

There is a potential that sums up the forces acting between two atoms, for instance, and it is known as the Lennard-Jones potential:
ilennardjones2.gif


A simplistic explanation would be this: (for simplicity, let us consider the hydrogen atom) when two atoms are sufficiently far apart, the attraction between the nucleus of one and the electron of the other outweighs the electron-electron and nucleus-nucleus repulsion between the two atoms, and thus the net force is attractive. Beyond a certain point, the repulsive forces are stronger than the attractive forces, resulting in a net repulsive force. In between lies an equilibrium point at which potential energy of the system is at a minimum and there exists no net force between the two atoms.

The actual mechanics of the system are far more complicated, and you may wish to search for "Lennard-Jones potential" to read up further.
 
Fightfish said:
I get what you mean now. You are mainly interested in molecular dynamics, of the attraction and repulsion between atoms/molecules.

There is a potential that sums up the forces acting between two atoms, for instance, and it is known as the Lennard-Jones potential:
ilennardjones2.gif


A simplistic explanation would be this: (for simplicity, let us consider the hydrogen atom) when two atoms are sufficiently far apart, the attraction between the nucleus of one and the electron of the other outweighs the electron-electron and nucleus-nucleus repulsion between the two atoms, and thus the net force is attractive. Beyond a certain point, the repulsive forces are stronger than the attractive forces, resulting in a net repulsive force. In between lies an equilibrium point at which potential energy of the system is at a minimum and there exists no net force between the two atoms.

The actual mechanics of the system are far more complicated, and you may wish to search for "Lennard-Jones potential" to read up further.

First I want to say thanks!

I did some research about it. This seems a little complicated as of right now, so far I've only learned classical mechanics in physics. So I feel a little bewildered. Do they teach us this in further physics classes?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K