Electrical conductivity of a semiconductor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the electrical conductivity of silicon doped with aluminum at 135°C. The main formula used is σ=|e|(ne*μe+nh*μh), where ne and nh represent the number of free electrons and holes, respectively, and their mobilities are provided. Participants clarify that since ne is significantly smaller than nh, it can be neglected, simplifying the equation to σ=|e|*nh*μh. The final calculated conductivity is 3360 (Ωm)-1, confirming the approach and calculations are correct. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding doping effects and material constants in semiconductor physics.
Plasmosis1
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Estimate the electrical conductivity, at 135°C, of silicon that has been doped with 3 x 1024 per meter cubed of aluminum atoms. Assume values for electron and hole mobilities of 0.03 and 0.007 m2/V-s, respectively.

Homework Equations



σ=|e|(nee+nhh)

σ=conductivity
e=1.6*10-19
ne=number of free electrons
μe=electron mobility
nh=number of holes
μh=hole mobility

The Attempt at a Solution



So far I have this:
σ=1.6*10-19*(ne*0.03+3*1024*0.007)

I don't know how to find ne. Is it the same value of nh?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Plasmosis1 said:
I don't know how to find ne. Is it the same value of nh?
Then doping would be pointless - no.
You should have some formula relating those two numbers (it also includes the temperature). Then the density of aluminium atoms (which type of doping is that?) allows to determine both.

So far I have this:
σ=1.6*10-19*(ne*0.03+3*1024*0.007)
Don't forget the units.
 
The only other formula that I can think of is n=n0exp(-Eg/2kT)
But I can't use that because I don't know n0 or Eg.
 
Last edited:
ne*nh = ?

You will have to look up at least one material constant of silicon.
 
Is the equation
ne*nh=(1.5x1010cm-3)2
where ni=1.5x1010cm-3

So ne=1.5*1010*1003m-3/(3*1024)=1.5*1016m-3
∴ σ=1.6*10-19*(1.5*1016*0.03+3*1024*0.007)=3360 (Ωm)-1

Is that right?
 
Where does the first equation come from?

The other equations look good (apart from formatting issues).
 
No one actually said this but because ne<<nh you can just neglect ne.

The original equation becomes:
σ=|e|*nhh
=1.6*10-19*3*1024*.007
=3360 (Ωm)-1
 
Back
Top