Electrical Power Loss Equations Confusion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the equation for power loss in electrical circuits, specifically why it is expressed as Power Loss = I^2*R instead of Power Loss = V*R. It clarifies that Ohm's Law (V = I*R) allows for different representations of power, such as V^2/R or V*I, depending on the known variables. The conversation also addresses the misconception that increasing voltage through transformers necessarily increases power loss, emphasizing that power loss decreases with higher voltage when the power supply remains constant. Ultimately, the participants conclude that understanding the context and relationships between voltage, current, and resistance is key to applying these equations correctly. The thread highlights the importance of grasping these fundamental concepts in electrical engineering.
Kevin Shen
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
Why is the equation Power Loss = I^2*R rather than Power Loss = V*I?
What I mean is why use I/R to represent V?
Also if Power Loss is equivalent to V*R, doesn't step up transformers which creating higher voltage also cause Power Loss to increase which contradicts to textbooks stating that power loss decreases if voltage rises given that power supply is same?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You could use V*I or V^2/R to represent power (not V*R). But you need to understand how to use it. Look at a resistor. If the resistor has 50 ohms, and there is 10 volts across it, how do you find the power dissipated in the resistor? You can find the current in the resistor, then multiply current x voltage (across the resistor). If you look at Ohm's Law [V = I*R, not I/R], then you can substitute one of these values for it's equivalent combination of the other 2.
 
Kevin Shen said:
Why is the equation Power Loss = I^2*R rather than Power Loss = V*R?What I mean is why use I/R to represent V?
Power isn't V*R it is either V2/R or V*I. And V isn't I/R, it is I*R.

But in either case, as said above you can use different equations for different problems depending on what you need.
 
russ_watters said:
Power isn't V*R it is either V2/R or V*I. And V isn't I/R, it is I*R.

But in either case, as said above you can use different equations for different problems depending on what you need.
Yeah I realized I made the error and I get it now :)
 
  • Like
Likes CWatters and russ_watters
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top