Electrical Power Loss Equations Confusion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the equation for power loss in electrical circuits, specifically why it is expressed as Power Loss = I^2*R instead of Power Loss = V*R. It clarifies that Ohm's Law (V = I*R) allows for different representations of power, such as V^2/R or V*I, depending on the known variables. The conversation also addresses the misconception that increasing voltage through transformers necessarily increases power loss, emphasizing that power loss decreases with higher voltage when the power supply remains constant. Ultimately, the participants conclude that understanding the context and relationships between voltage, current, and resistance is key to applying these equations correctly. The thread highlights the importance of grasping these fundamental concepts in electrical engineering.
Kevin Shen
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
Why is the equation Power Loss = I^2*R rather than Power Loss = V*I?
What I mean is why use I/R to represent V?
Also if Power Loss is equivalent to V*R, doesn't step up transformers which creating higher voltage also cause Power Loss to increase which contradicts to textbooks stating that power loss decreases if voltage rises given that power supply is same?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You could use V*I or V^2/R to represent power (not V*R). But you need to understand how to use it. Look at a resistor. If the resistor has 50 ohms, and there is 10 volts across it, how do you find the power dissipated in the resistor? You can find the current in the resistor, then multiply current x voltage (across the resistor). If you look at Ohm's Law [V = I*R, not I/R], then you can substitute one of these values for it's equivalent combination of the other 2.
 
Kevin Shen said:
Why is the equation Power Loss = I^2*R rather than Power Loss = V*R?What I mean is why use I/R to represent V?
Power isn't V*R it is either V2/R or V*I. And V isn't I/R, it is I*R.

But in either case, as said above you can use different equations for different problems depending on what you need.
 
russ_watters said:
Power isn't V*R it is either V2/R or V*I. And V isn't I/R, it is I*R.

But in either case, as said above you can use different equations for different problems depending on what you need.
Yeah I realized I made the error and I get it now :)
 
  • Like
Likes CWatters and russ_watters
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top