Electrodes for use in the electrolysis of water

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the use of various materials as electrodes for the electrolysis of water. Inert metals like platinum and stainless steel are recommended, while carbon is noted for its reactivity at the anode, where it can potentially react with oxygen to form carbon dioxide or monoxide. Users report that using copper as an electrode is ineffective, possibly due to its non-inert nature and high overpotential for water decomposition. The surface texture of electrodes is also discussed, with smoother surfaces potentially hindering gas formation due to a lack of nucleation sites. The importance of selecting the right electrode material is emphasized, as it significantly affects the kinetics of the electrolysis process. Additionally, the use of porous graphite electrodes is mentioned, which can lead to water discoloration, indicating a reaction occurring. The conversation touches on the potential for using carbon nanotubes as a catalyst to enhance the reaction efficiency.
ironalias
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Ok so I just have a few questions.

I've been reading up on the electrolysis of water and just read a few things about electrodes. The article I was reading supports the use of inert metals such platinum and stainless steel, but it also included carbon. I've actually used carbon to decompose water by connecting a 9V battery to two separate pencils. My question with carbon is, at the anode, where oxygen is produced, because there is an electrical charge, will this carbon react with the oxygen to form carbon dioxide or monoxide?

Also, I tried using copper by itself as an electrode and it did not seem to work. Any ideas? the wire was smooth, so should the surface of an electrode be coarse as to possesses nucleation sites for the gases to form?

And for a vague question, what makes a good electrode, specifically for the electrolysis of water?

(These are not homework question. Purely interest.)
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Copper is not inert enough. Smooth surface can be a source of problem, it also could be that there is a high overpotential required for water decomposition on copper. Most of the oxygen producing electrode reactions are slow, their speed depend on the electrode material - so correct selection of material is crucial. But I can't help you in details, I just know that it is a kinetics problem, I don't know any solutions.

Carbon electrodes do react with oxygen, from what I remember they react producing carbon dioxide.
 
I'd rather guess graphite oxide instead of CO2. When I did it, the graphite decomposed into a black slurry.
 
DrDu said:
I'd rather guess graphite oxide instead of CO2. When I did it, the graphite decomposed into a black slurry.

Same here. Last time I build an electrolyzer it used porous graphite electrodes which eventually turned the water a dark tint of black. I have yet to find a good material which works well for electrolyzers unless you have a very good catalyst (ie. Platinum, Palladium, etc). Stainless steel works well on the cathode side but I've read that Oxygen will slowly react with the Chromium in the SS and generate Chromium Oxide.
 
DrDu said:
I'd rather guess graphite oxide instead of CO2. When I did it, the graphite decomposed into a black slurry.

Well graphite oxide is actually yellow in color, so it's probably not that. Most likely just bit and pieces of the graphite breaking and cracking.

How would you go about catalizing this reaction?
 
How about carbon nanotubes "drop cast" onto some metal electrode of your choice?
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top