Electrodynamic checks of the equivalence principle

AI Thread Summary
Experimental tests of the Equivalence Principle (EP) in electrodynamics have been explored, notably through the bending of light predicted by Einstein and confirmed by Eddington's experiment. The gravitational redshift of light, tested using the Mossbauer effect in 1959, also supports the EP. Discussions have shifted towards the behavior of charged particles, with references to a direct experiment on the free fall of electrons. The potential for further exploration in atomic physics, given that atoms consist of charged particles, is suggested as a promising area for future research. Overall, while initial tests focus on light, there is interest in expanding the investigation to charged particles and atomic systems.
lalbatros
Messages
1,247
Reaction score
2
Hello,

I would like to know if there are experimental tests of the Equivalence Principle in the realm of electrodynamics. The book by http://books.google.com/books?id=Bh...eriment+in+Gravitational+Physics&lr=#PPP1,M1" contains a lot of material about the equivalence principle. The Einstein Equivalence Principle is of course defined and it clearly extends the weak equivalence principle to any possible experiments in accelerated frames or in the presence of a gravitational field.

However, I could not find any description of an experimental test of the EEP in the domain of electrodynamics.

Would you know some?

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The very first experimental test of the equivalence principle was in the field of electrodynamics, i.e. the effect of gravity on light. Einstein predicted that gravity would bend light, and this was tested in a famous experiment by Eddington. Another effect on electrodynamics is the gravitational redshift of light. This was tested very precisely using the Mossbauer effect in 1959. These same effects are also predicted by quantum electrodynamics in exact agreement with general relativity, and quantum electrodynamics is the most accurately tested theory we currently have, so you can consider this consistency also as a check of the equivalence principle.
 
Last edited:
Thanks dx,

Indeed light is the first example!
However, I was more thinking to charged particles.

I found a direct experiment on the free fall of electrons: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967PhRvL..19.1049W".
See also: http://books.google.com/books?id=8yAssyaLq2sC&pg=PA264&lpg=PA264&dq=%22Experimental+comparison+of+the+gravitational+force+on+freely+falling+electrons+and+metallic+electrons%22&source=web&ots=IXvQQpZD7A&sig=E6kaONtu4GO6qFIcNESlAkdc7LY&hl=en&ei=CRCMSZCLENKX_gaJvbTBDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=5&ct=result#PPR8,M1"
I only read the abstract, but it looks quite interresting although also rather limited and unprecise.

But since atoms are made of charged particles, would there be something to look at in atomic physics?

Thanks already.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top