Electrolyte Reaction at the Cathode: Na+, Cl-, O2 + H2O --> NaClO2 + H2O

  • Thread starter Thread starter dumbadum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cathode Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the chemical equation for the cathode reaction involving Na+, Cl-, O2, and H2O. The initial attempt at the equation, Na+ + Cl- + O2 + H2O --> NaClO2 + H2O, is identified as incorrect. Participants emphasize the need to clarify the processes occurring at the cathode, specifically whether oxidation or reduction takes place. Understanding standard notations for electrolytic cells is also highlighted as essential for accurate representation. The conversation ultimately seeks a correct formulation of the cathodic reaction.
dumbadum
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
The question asks to write the chemical equation representing the cathode.
The electrolyte at the cathode is Na+, Cl-, O2 and H2O

What I would do is:
Na+ + Cl- + O2 + H2O --> NaClO2 + H2O
But that's obviously wrong. Please show me how to go about it.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it's relevant to standard denotations of the electrolytic cell, all of this should be explained very well in your text, so there's no point for any of us to reiterate everything to you here.
 
What process happens at the cathode - i.e. oxidation or reduction?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top