Electromagnet Design for Separating Ferrous Material from an Ore Mixture

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on designing an electromagnet to separate ferrous materials from an ore mixture, specifically requiring a flux density of 792.7177 Gauss to operate effectively under a burden depth of 400mm. The designer seeks equations to predict the flux density at a distance from the core and is considering factors such as coil diameter, core height, number of turns, and current. Suggestions include using modeling software for accurate predictions and adjusting the flux density to at least 800 Gauss for better performance, with a recommendation to consider a thinner layer for separation. A resource link is provided for further guidance on magnetic attraction principles. Accurate calculations and adjustments are crucial for successful electromagnet design.
Matthew Howard
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Good day

I've been the task of designing an electromagnet to remove ferrous material from ore mixture. I've calculated the flux density require to remove the particle from underneath a burden depth of 400mm; which is 792.7177 Gauss. (Force index is: 1.5710*10^6 G^2/m)

However what I've been struggling with is determining the flux density generated by the electromagnet at distance x from the core (400mm). I need to design it with respect to:

Inner coil diameter
Height of core and coil
Number of turns
Current

From my understand the best way to solve this problem is to model it on modelling software. ut if anyone could give me an equation that would be able to accurately predict the flux density. I would be most grateful and please correct me if my values above are incorrect. I am new to electromagnets.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello Matthew, :welcome:

Your task is honorable but far from simple for a newbie. What tools do you have to help you with the design ? Any 'getting started' stuff from colleagues (or competitors, or equipment vendors) ?

Can you follow the calculations such as these ? (In your case the gap is relatively huge, so I don't know how good the expressions will be...)

As a physicist I'd say that the 40 cm is one digit accuracy, so you need at least 800 Gauss , not 792.7177 . But If I were you I'd add a factor of ten just for good measure, to pull the stuff from underneath a layer of heavy sediments...
In fact I'd redesign to pull them from a much thinner layer, like e.g 10 cm on a conveyor belt or something.
 
Start from this one:
http://maurermagnetic.ch/PDF/White-Paper-E-magnetic-attraction-particles.pdf
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
43
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
35K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top