Electromagnetic Induction and Magnetism Questions

AI Thread Summary
Permanent magnets can lose their magnetism over time, though some may retain it indefinitely under certain conditions. In the theoretical scenario presented, satellites orbiting a magnetized iron sphere would indeed experience electromagnetic induction, similar to how generators operate. However, this system would not produce perpetual energy, as the magnetic field would exert drag on the satellites, causing them to slow down and eventually fall. The discussion also highlights Lenz's law, which explains the drag effect observed in electromagnetic systems. Overall, while the concept of energy generation through this method is intriguing, it ultimately adheres to the laws of physics, including conservation of energy.
krfkeith
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Ok, I have two questions:
First of all, are there any instances in which a magnet (not an electromagnet) will remain magnetized forever? I know that some magnets do lost their magnetivity

Secondly, if the above is true then consider the following theoretical scenario:

Imagine a large Iron sphere in space that is magnetized, it is large enough to allow multiple small satellites to orbit it. Now, all of these little satellites are in the same orbit path and are connected to each other with a large wire. Since the the satellites would be orbiting around the sphere, wouldn't this create energy through electromagnetic induction? Moreover, wouldn't this system continue to produce energy unless it was destroyed? I'm not doubting the law of conservation of energy, just a bit confused

Thanks,
Kevin

P.S. I have a poor knowledge of physics so if what I say is just completely idiotic or I left something out forgive me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi krfkieth,

They would perfrom electromagnetic induction in the same way a faraday or homopolar generator would.

however, it wouldn't defy the laws of conservation of energy because the magnetic field of the sphere would create drag on the satalites as they orbit so they would eventially slow down and plumit tot he surface of the sphere.

Perhaps you have seen this experiment? You need an alluminium pipe and a reasonably strong magnet.

first drop the magnet at shoulder height and note how long it takes for the magnet to hit the ground.

then drop the magnet through the alluminium tubes. You will notice it falls ALOT slower.

This is because fo the drag from the induction on the alluminium tube by Lenz law. The same drag can be found in any dynamo or electromagnetic generator. (and god help you if you break Lenz law because then you have a generator with no drag! You would have a so called "free energy device").
 
Thank you! I had not heard of the Lenz law!
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top