Electromagnetic Induction in AC circuits

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on electromagnetic induction in AC circuits, participants analyze a series circuit containing a resistor, capacitor, and inductor connected to a 120 V (rms) source. The maximum current occurs at a specific frequency determined by the formula f = 1 / (2π√(LC)), but users struggle to calculate the correct frequency. The maximum rms current is found using the formula Irms = Vrms / XC, where XC is the capacitive reactance. When replacing the capacitor with a larger value, the new rms current is recalculated using the same principles. The conversation highlights confusion about the calculations and the relevance of reactance in determining current.
Cal66
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
A 9.7 Ω resistor, a 10.8 µF capacitor, and a 27.9 mH inductor are connected in series with a 120 V (rms) source with variable frequency.
(a) At what frequency will the current be maximum?

Hz



(b) Find the maximum rms current.

A



(c) Suppose you now replace the 10.8 µF capacitor by a 22.0 µF capacitor. What is the new value of the rms current?

A





a ) frequency f = 1 / 2π √ L C
= 1/ 2π √27.9 mH * 10.8μF
= _____ Hz cannot get right frequency
b ) Maximum rms current Irms = Vrms / XC
XC = 1/ 2π f C
= 1/ 2π * f Hz * 10.8μF
= _____ Ω
Irms = 120 V / XC Ω
= ____
c ) Maximum rms current Irms = Vrms / XC
XC = 1/ 2π f C
= 1/ 2π * f Hz * 22.0μF
= ___ Ω
Irms = 120 V / XC Ω
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What value frequency did you calculate? What did they provide as the correct answer?

Why do you divide by Xc to get the current?
 
scottdave said:
What value frequency did you calculate? What did they provide as the correct answer?

Why do you divide by Xc to get the current?
Note that Post #1 is dated 1 April 2010!
 
Steve4Physics said:
Note that Post #1 is dated 1 April 2010!
Ha! :woot: These Unanswered Questions just show up... and I'm so into trying to help - I forget to look at the date.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top