Electromagnetic Induction of a permanent megnet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of electromagnetic induction involving a rotating permanent magnet and a surrounding coil. The initial scenario considers an axially polarized magnet, where it is concluded that no induced voltage occurs due to the lack of change in magnetic flux as the magnet rotates. When the magnet is radially polarized, it is argued that induced voltage remains zero because the angle between the magnetic field and the coil is 90 degrees, resulting in zero flux linkage. A third scenario introduces a coil that partially surrounds the magnet, which complicates the situation, but the consensus is that induced voltage is still zero due to the same angular relationship. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding magnetic field variations and their impact on induced voltage in different configurations.
markuz88
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

How are you doing?

I have a doubt about electromagnetic induction, in three particular cases. I need to confirm that I have the right concepts, so I ask for your help.

The main problem:

Imagine that you have a permanent magnet, axially polarized and rotating on its axis with a constant angular speed. Surrounding this magnet, a coil (constant area section pointing in the same direction of magnet polarization). The main question is: will there be induced voltage?

This is what I think:

1) We know that, for a constant Area, flux linkage ψ = B*A*cos θ.
In this case θ = 0°, so ψ = B*A.
And the induced voltage is ε = -N*dψ/dt = -N*A*dB/dt.

In this main case, I think that there will be no variation in B, because the rotation does not change it at all. So dB/dt = 0, thus ε = 0.

2) Let's suppose the magnet is now radially polarized, but keeping the surrounding coil. In this case, can I affirm that rotation still doesn't change B at all (actually it does change B, but if we consider the whole thing it does not)? And not only because of this ε is zero, but θ = 90°, which implies ψ = 0.

3) Now suppose the coil doesn't fully surround the magnet. Let's say it covers only 270° of it (a little abstraction is needed, I know :-p). In this case of non-symmetry, there will be a variation in B, but ε is still zero because θ = 90°.

Am I correct? Did I miss something?

Thank you,

Marcus
 
Physics news on Phys.org
markuz88 said:
Hello everyone,

How are you doing?

I have a doubt about electromagnetic induction, in three particular cases. I need to confirm that I have the right concepts, so I ask for your help.

The main problem:

Imagine that you have a permanent magnet, axially polarized and rotating on its axis with a constant angular speed. Surrounding this magnet, a coil (constant area section pointing in the same direction of magnet polarization). The main question is: will there be induced voltage?

This is what I think:

1) We know that, for a constant Area, flux linkage ψ = B*A*cos θ.
In this case θ = 0°, so ψ = B*A.
And the induced voltage is ε = -N*dψ/dt = -N*A*dB/dt.

In this main case, I think that there will be no variation in B, because the rotation does not change it at all. So dB/dt = 0, thus ε = 0.
Correct.

markuz88 said:
2) Let's suppose the magnet is now radially polarized, but keeping the surrounding coil. In this case, can I affirm that rotation still doesn't change B at all (actually it does change B, but if we consider the whole thing it does not)? And not only because of this ε is zero, but θ = 90°, which implies ψ = 0.
Correct.

markuz88 said:
3) Now suppose the coil doesn't fully surround the magnet. Let's say it covers only 270° of it (a little abstraction is needed, I know :-p). In this case of non-symmetry, there will be a variation in B, but ε is still zero because θ = 90°.
I don't understand your geometry. The classic case is a bar magnet magnetized along its axis z, near a coil parallel to the x-y plane that is located a small distance away along the z axis. Now spin the magnet around the x-axis (at the magnet midline). Each time the pole swings past the coil, it introduces a large flux in the coil.
 
Ah, first, I forgot to tell that these permanent magnets are round magnets.

But the third case is a bit more complicated... well, you have just described a "common" generator, right?

And thank you for your reply! If you let me, I want to ask you other geometry. This is going to help me understand a bit more. I drew it to make it easier to see the problem. The red/blue part of magnet is only north/south pole division (ie, in the picture, it is polarized along axis X).

aEZLQ.png


If this magnet rotates around axis X with a constant speed ω, as the coil remain still, should I expect induced voltage? I guess not, because, again, θ = 90°. But what I can't see is: what if the magnet is polarized in Z axis? Notice that this is very similar to case (2) I described before, but the coil is in front of the magnet, not surrounding it.

Thanks again,

Marcus
 
First part--you are right. Second part--what do you think? Draw your magnet as a dipole, for example, and draw a few field lines around it to see what happens.
 
I think I see... dB/dt will not be zero.

Thanks for your help, marcusl.
 
You are welcome.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Back
Top