Electromagnetic mass acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the design of an electromagnetic mass accelerator, utilizing 4 or 5 electrolytic capacitors rated at 400V and a dual-stage coil with IR photo gates. The main challenge highlighted is the low efficiency of such devices, with 8% being the highest reported. An IGBT switch is chosen for its efficiency in pulsing energy from the capacitors, while an iron tube is used for shielding the coil. Participants suggest exploring low ESR capacitors and consider mechanical switches to reduce resistance. The conversation emphasizes that efficiency losses may stem from the air gap between the projectile and the iron shield, indicating a need to address the reluctance of the electromagnetic field.
oldunion
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
some of you may have heard of a guass gun, coil gun, or em mass accelerator. if not google has you covered. I am designing a system which will utilize 4 or 5 electrolytic capacitors rated for 400v per cap, a dual stage coil with ir photo gates, and some other things.

The principle is that a high voltage is discharged into a coil of copper wire (solenoid) which creates a strong magnetic field inside the coil. This in turn can launch a projectile sitting inside this coil.

The major problem with these devices is overal efficiency, 8% is the most I've ever heard of. I will be using an IGBT switch, which is the most efficient means of pulsing the energy from the capacitors.

I am also shielding the coil with a silencer looking tube of iron.

Does anyone else know of a way to further the efficiency in such a scenario
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yep, FBI will be very keen to be informed about it ;)
 
oldunion said:
some of you may have heard of a guass gun, coil gun, or em mass accelerator. if not google has you covered. I am designing a system which will utilize 4 or 5 electrolytic capacitors rated for 400v per cap, a dual stage coil with ir photo gates, and some other things.

The principle is that a high voltage is discharged into a coil of copper wire (solenoid) which creates a strong magnetic field inside the coil. This in turn can launch a projectile sitting inside this coil.

The major problem with these devices is overal efficiency, 8% is the most I've ever heard of. I will be using an IGBT switch, which is the most efficient means of pulsing the energy from the capacitors.

I am also shielding the coil with a silencer looking tube of iron.

Does anyone else know of a way to further the efficiency in such a scenario


Google finds

http://www.oz.net/~coilgun/mark2/home.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
pervect said:
Google finds

http://www.oz.net/~coilgun/mark2/home.htm

well the fbi can come kick in my door if they want, but considering how the local sports authority is selling bb guns at higher velocity than what i could make, they have better things to do.


I have already read half of the oznet. I am more or less into theory now, and I am nearly to the point of being able to pose an educated question to my physics professor.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your implication is that the resistance of the switch device is the culprit. If so, replace the semiconductor with a mechanical knife switch. Not fancy, byt effectively 'no' resistance.
Your problem may be the resistance of the capacitors.
Look for low ESR (Equivalent series resistance) capacitors.
Try aluminum electrolytic capacitors.
 
joe tomei said:
Your implication is that the resistance of the switch device is the culprit. If so, replace the semiconductor with a mechanical knife switch. Not fancy, byt effectively 'no' resistance.
Your problem may be the resistance of the capacitors.
Look for low ESR (Equivalent series resistance) capacitors.
Try aluminum electrolytic capacitors.

the internal gate bipolar transistor (igbt) is the most efficient switch they have for this application. Electrolytic capacitors will be used. i don't imply to know what the cause for poor efficiency is, but since youve sprung it on me, i would say that most efficiency is lost due to the air gap between the projectile and the external iron shield (which covers the coil) at the muzzle. So this would indicate that i believe the primary loss of efficiency has to do with overall reluctance of the em field.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top