Electron accelerated from .89c to .97c

  • Thread starter Thread starter danielatha4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron
danielatha4
Messages
113
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


SLAC, the Stanford Linear Accelerator Collider, located at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, accelerates electrons through a vacuum tube two miles long (it can be seen from an overpass of the Junipero Serra freeway that goes right over the accelerator). Electrons which are initially at rest are subjected to a continuous force of 1.2×10-12 Newton along the entire length of two miles (one mile is 1.6 kilometers) and reach speeds very near the speed of light.

Determine how much time is required to increase the electrons' speed from 0.89c to 0.97c.

Approximately how far does the electron go in this time? (What is approximate about your result?)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I figured the acceleration of the electron would be equal to the force, 1.22x10^-12, divided by the mass of an electron, 9.1x10^-31. Then I used Vf=Vo+at to solve for time. However, this was not correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a relativistic problem and you have to use relativistic equations.

The Newton's second law is correct here in the momentum form:

<br /> \frac{\partial \mathbf{p}}{\partial t} = \mathbf{F}.<br />

The speed dependence of momentum is nonlinear:

<br /> \mathbf{p} = m\gamma(v)\mathbf{v}.<br />

The equation for x(t) will be very complicated. Perhaps the ultrarelativistic approximation will simplify it. But I'm not sure it could be used for v=0.89c.
 
My teacher did give us the equation \DeltaP=Fnet\Deltat

However, solving the final and initial relativistic momentum for the change in momentum, and dividing by the force applied gives me 4.64*10^-12 seconds, and that's not right.
 
My result is 4.64*10-10 s.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top