Electron, Atom, Planet, Star: Do All Galaxies Orbit a Single Mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Destrio
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the analogy of orbits at various scales, questioning whether all galaxies orbit a single, greater mass. While some galaxies are part of clusters that orbit a common center, many drift through intergalactic space without a central gravitational influence. It is emphasized that there is no defined "center" to the universe, and not all galaxies must orbit a common center. The nature of electron behavior is also clarified, noting that electron positions are probabilistic rather than orbital in the gravitational sense. The presence of dark matter complicates the understanding of gravitational forces affecting galaxies, as much of this mass remains undetected.
Destrio
Messages
211
Reaction score
0
that if all electrons orbit atoms,
and atoms in the form of moons orbit planets,
and planets orbit stars,
and stars orbit the black hole in the centre of their galaxy,
will all galaxies orbit around a single greater, or greatest mass?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Some galaxies are part of a "cluster" of many galaxies. These in turn orbit a common center.

This is not a requirement. Many galaxies are drifting through intergalactic space, orbiting nothing.

There is no "center" to the universe, and certainly no requirement that all galaxies shall orbit a common center.

Lastly, electrons orbiting the nucleus of an atom has nothing to do with gravity.
 
Electrons don't orbit in the same sense that astronomical objects do. Electrons are at various energy levels in the neighborhood of the nucleus.
 
mathman said:
Electrons don't orbit in the same sense that astronomical objects do. Electrons are at various energy levels in the neighborhood of the nucleus.

True, and these energy levels are really just points in space around the nucleus where there is a high probability of finding an electron. Also, the electrons also differ in that their position and speed may never be determined simultaneously due to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.

As for the galaxies orbiting a common senter of gravity, it is actually a bit hard to conclude on this as there seems to be a lot more (dark) matter in the universe than what is accounted for at the present, so some galaxies and stars seem to be orbiting some mass excerting gravitational force, though this mass has not yet been found.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top