Electron in a Quantum State: Finding Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of eigenvectors and eigenvalues for an electron in a quantum state, specifically addressing concerns about the correctness of part b) of the problem. The user expresses uncertainty about their calculations, particularly regarding the dependence of the parameter b on the constant μ, which they later clarify does not affect the eigenvectors. They derive the eigenvalues and attempt to find the eigenvector, ultimately leading to a probability calculation for the electron's position. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the mathematical principles underlying quantum mechanics, with references to relevant equations and solutions. Overall, the user gains clarity on their approach and acknowledges the need to strengthen their foundational knowledge in quantum physics.
Taylor_1989
Messages
400
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


If possible could someone have a look at my working for this problem, I am not sure if I have carried out part b) correctly. I have done all three problem and carried through my solution to b) just to see if it did simplify out, which it didn’t which make me think I may have carried b) out incorrect. I have attached the question as a picture due to the amount of content.

QM1.png


Homework Equations


$$\hat{H}|n\rangle-IE_{n}|n\rangle \:[1]$$
$$P(R)=|\left\langle R|n \right\rangle|^2 \: [2]$$

The Attempt at a Solution


My working for a)
$$|n\rangle=A|n\rangle+B|n\rangle$$
$$|n\rangle=A\begin{pmatrix}1\\ 0\end{pmatrix}+B\begin{pmatrix}0\\ 1\end{pmatrix}$$
$$|n\rangle=\begin{pmatrix}A\\ 0\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}0\\ B\end{pmatrix}$$
$$|n\rangle=\begin{pmatrix}A\\ B\end{pmatrix}$$
Finding the eingevalue
$$\hat{H}|n\rangle-IE_{n}|n\rangle=0$$
$$\hat{H}-IE_{n}=0$$
$$\begin{pmatrix}\mu &-\mu \\ -\mu &2\mu \end{pmatrix}-\begin{pmatrix}E_n&0\\ 0&E_n\end{pmatrix}=0$$
Find the Characteristic equation, using the determinate of the matrix below,
$$\begin{pmatrix}\mu -E_n&-\mu \\ -\mu &2\mu -E_n\end{pmatrix}=0$$
$$\left(\mu -E_n\right)\left(2\mu -E_n\right)-\mu ^2=0$$
Solving the quartic I get the following roots
$$E_0=\frac{3\mu -\sqrt{5}\mu }{2}\:,\:E_1=\frac{3\mu \:+\sqrt{5}\mu \:}{2}$$

b) finding the eigenvector
$$\begin{pmatrix}\mu &-\mu \\ -\mu &2\mu \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}A\\ B\end{pmatrix}-\left(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)\begin{pmatrix}\mu A\\ \mu B\end{pmatrix}=0$$
Solving the top line
$$\mu A-\mu B-\left(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)\mu A=0$$
I have kept ##\mu## in as it want ##b(\mu)##
if ##A=1## the I get the following
$$|0\rangle=\begin{pmatrix}\mu \\ \left(\frac{-1+\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)\mu \end{pmatrix}$$
I am going to ommit the normalising constants as they will cancel through, as they are the same, and as stated not need for this part of the problem.
$$\begin{pmatrix}\mu \\ \left(\frac{-1+\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)\mu \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}1\\ \frac{1}{2}-b\end{pmatrix}$$
I do think this is wrong because I really can't understand why the above works, I understanding the if you scale and eignevector not matter what, the eigenvalue will still be the same, but, I can't see how the above is correct as in this case ##\mu=1## anyway carring on solving through I get the following for b.
$$b(\mu)=\frac{1}{2}+\left(\frac{\left(1-\sqrt{5}\right)\mu }{2}\right)$$

this gave me the new ground state vector
$$|0\rangle = N_0\begin{pmatrix}1\\ \frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{\left(1-\sqrt{5}\right)}{2}\end{pmatrix}=N_0\begin{pmatrix}1\\ \left(\frac{\sqrt{5}-1}{2}\mu \right)\end{pmatrix}$$

c) assuming that ##b(\mu)## is correct I then did the following
$$\langle 0|0 \rangle=N_{0}^2(|L\rangle + \frac{\left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)}{2}\mu|R\rangle)(\langle L| + \frac{\left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)}{2}\mu\langle R|)$$
So multiplying out a ##\langle 0|0 \rangle=1## I make ##N_0=\sqrt{\frac{2}{2+\left(3-\sqrt{5}\right)\mu ^2}}##

So now find find the probability I did the following first I found
$$\langle R|0\rangle=\sqrt{\frac{2}{2+\left(3-\sqrt{5}\right)\mu ^2}}\left(\frac{\left(3-\sqrt{5}\right)\mu ^2}{2}\right)$$

Using equation [2] I found the probability for the electron to be in the right to be
$$P(R)=\frac{\left(14-6\sqrt{5}\right)\mu ^{4\:}}{4+2\left(3-\sqrt{5}\right)\mu ^2}$$

As I have stated I am not really sure if my b is correct, but can't really see any other way of making it a constant function
 

Attachments

  • QM1.png
    QM1.png
    59.1 KB · Views: 552
Physics news on Phys.org
OK for part (a). For part (b), I think you've been thrown off course by the statement of the problem which implies that the parameter b will be a function of μ. Note the form of the Hamiltonian. μ is just an overall multiplicative constant. So, should the eigenvectors of H depend on μ?
 
No, I don’t think so because the of the fact alls you effectively is extending the vector in the direction it already going in. I originally thought this but then beacuse the question stated it as a function I was not sure.
 
Taylor_1989 said:
b) finding the eigenvector
$$\begin{pmatrix}\mu &-\mu \\ -\mu &2\mu \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}A\\ B\end{pmatrix}-\left(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)\begin{pmatrix}\mu A\\ \mu B\end{pmatrix}=0$$
Solving the top line
$$\mu A-\mu B-\left(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)\mu A=0$$
Since ##\mu## cancels out in this equation, ##A## and ##B## do not depend on ##\mu##. So, ##b## will not depend on ##\mu##.
 
Thank for the response, I have realized what going on, I did cancel through originally and just had the value. But for some reason I seem to think when it comes to quantum physics "maybe this could be true" and forget the basics of maths, in part iv only just been introduced this year so I am still trying to wrap my head around more the concepts that anything, I have started going through Griffith which seem to be a very good book for the concepts, so hopefully I won't make silly mistakes like this again. Once again much appreciated.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top