Electron in Earth Orbit: Does it Emit Radiation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yogi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Orbit
yogi
Messages
1,523
Reaction score
10
Does an electron in circular Earth orbit emit radiation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A good question, similar to the question: "Does an electron 'sitting' on a laboratory bench emit radiation as by the equivalence principle it is accelerating upwards at an acceleration g?"

If the answer to the orbiting scenario is 'yes', then the electron might be expected to spiral inwards to conserve energy; however where does the energy of radiation of an emitting supported electron on a lab bench come from?

Garth
 
Last edited:
yogi: Yes. An e in Earth orbit behaves classically because its radial quantum number is so high. It would emit what is called Larmor radiation at the rate:
P=2e^2 R^2 \omega^2/3c^2. (This is in Gaussian units.)
You can put numbers into see that this radiated power is tiny.

Garth: The EP does not hold for radiation by electric charges.
There is another post about that today.
 
Meir Achuz said:
Garth: The EP does not hold for radiation by electric charges.
There is another post about that today.
Why not? It would seem logical to expect that all physical processes within this universe's space-time would be subject to the the geometric effects and principles of GR.

There has been dicsussion on this subject on these Forums some time ago.

Garth
 
Seems the references cited in the other thread support the notion that 1) an electron in freefall will radiate, and 2) an observer comoving in the freefalling frame does not see the radiation? So unless there is some identifiable local physics that tell the electron in free fall when and how to radiate - the radiation must be due to a global property. If we place a charged spherical capacitor in orbit we should expect to detect radio frequence signals? - what about a charged parallel plate capacitor?
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top