Electron orbits, QM, Exclusion Principle and location

eehiram
Messages
116
Reaction score
0
I remember that electrons exist in the probability cloud that corresponds to the orbital they reside in, and according to the Pauli Exclusion Principle, they can't share spin in the same orbital.

According to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, when the wavefunction is collapsed because the electron is observed, is it located near it's previous location the last time it was observed or is it anywhere in the probability cloud? I ask this because I thought the electron can be anywhere in the probability cloud, even despite having previously been observed to be in a specific point.

So perhaps the electron appears at any random place at any time, right?

o| Hiram
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not an expert in the field of QM. But it is clear that Measurement in QM is a very big and at times controversial subject. I would guess that the electron would be distributed according to its probability distribution and your previous measurement cannot tell you anything about your next.
 
"So perhaps the electron appears at any random place at any time, right?"...maybe the uncertainty answer this question...now try the example of an electron going to a square potential barrier... there is a probability that the electron will be in other region after the barrier but it is a small probability and if u take the electron over it , the probability is big of finding the electron in the 3rd region and so the transmission coefficient is higher then the reflected coefficeint now if the energy is equal the potential energy ...shroedinger's solution is linear now and so some things changes ... but for me i know there is a transmission coeff. but i am not getting to it ... i keep trying ... hope i helped in some way
 
I think I understood part of it

Let me clarify this: if the electron is in region 1, and goes near a square potential barrier, it might be found in region 2, on the other side of the barrier. If we take the part of the wavefunction that has crossed over, then sometime later it might be found in region 3, also on the other side of the square potential barrier and even farther away from region 1 than region 2?

This would mean that the electron partially might moving consistently in that general direction. This does help me with my original question.

Would part of the wavefunction still be found in region 1 when the wavefunction reaches region 3?

o| Hiram
 
yes absolutely ...because we have incident wave and reflected wave and tunneling wave and transmission wave ...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top