I Electron-Positron Pair Instability Supernova

AI Thread Summary
The formation of electron-positron pairs during a supernova leads to increased energy density and a softening of the equation of state (EOS) by reducing internal radiation pressure. When high-energy gamma rays collide with atomic nuclei, they can produce these pairs, which contributes to instability in supermassive stars. As the energy density rises, the adiabatic index drops below 4/3, indicating a softer EOS that allows for easier compression of the star's material. This softening results in smaller radii for the stars, as they resist gravitational collapse less effectively. Ultimately, the interplay between pair production and energy density is crucial in understanding the dynamics of pair-instability supernovae.
debs1
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
How does the formation of electron positron pairs increase the energy density and softens the EOS?

I trrying to understand the pair instability supernova. In many texts and articles, it is written that the formation of electron positron pairs lead to instability, the energy density is increased and the adiabatic index drops below 4/3 which softens the equation of state.

  • How does the formation of electron positron pairs lead to instability?
  • How is the energy density increased?
  • What does it mean by 'softening of EOS' and how does it happen?
Ref:
1) https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967ApJ...148..803R/abstract
2)https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.12874
3)https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.07889
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Wherever this gets moved to, you'll need some references for where you've been reading this stuff.
 
PeroK said:
:welcome:

Wherever this gets moved to, you'll need some references for where you've been reading this stuff.
I have included some references
 
debs1 said:
What does it mean by 'softening of EOS' and how does it happen?
The best statement I can readily find states "A stiff equation of state tends to have larger pressure for a given density. This material resists compression and these stars have larger radii. Naturally, a soft equation of state has smaller pressures, is more easily compressed, and produces stars with smaller radii."

The threshold for pair production is 1.022 MeV. A photon of that or greater theshold would produce an electron-proton pair and transform photon energy into rest mass + some kinetic energy, where the kinetic energy would be given by the difference in the total photon energy before and rest energy after. Then shortly thereafter, the positron would find an electron and annihilate, which would produce 2 photons of 0.511 MeV.

debs1 said:
How is the energy density increased?
Energy density would increase during the collapse, or as the radius decreases?

Did the questions arise from the following article, which cites Ref 1?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair-instability_supernova
the production of free electrons and positrons in the collision between atomic nuclei and energetic gamma rays, temporarily reduces the internal radiation pressure supporting a supermassive star's core against gravitational collapse.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair-instability_supernova#cite_note-1

From the article,
In very massive, hot stars with interior temperatures above about 300000000 K (3×108 K), photons produced in the stellar core are primarily in the form of very high energy-level gamma rays. The pressure from these gamma rays fleeing outward from the core helps to hold up the upper layers of the star against the inward pull of gravity. If the level of gamma rays (the energy density) is reduced, then the outer layers of the star will begin to collapse inwards.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top