Electron scattering find acceleration

fishys182
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Lead nucleus has charge = +82e
and raadius R = 7.10*10^(-15) m
permittivity of free space = 8.85*10^(-12) C^2/Nm^2
magnitude of charge on electron e = 1.60*10^(-19) C
mass of electron = 9.11*10^(-31) kg

find the acceleration 4R from the center of the lead nucleus.

how do i do this?

F = kqQ/(r^2) then a = F/m doesn't work out. I am not sure if I am using the correct values for the q and Q though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a = F/m should work.

What values are you using for Q (nucleus) and q (electron)?

For electron q = e = -1.60*10^(-19) C

For the nucleus, it depends if one is considering the shielding of the electrons or not. Q on the nucleus = Ze = +82e = 82*1.60*10^(-19) C.

At 4R, where R is the effective radius of the nucleus, the electron probably experiences the full coulombic field of the nucleus.

And in the denominator, r2 would be (4R)2
 
thank you.

i got to this point, but now i am confused about how it would be different if it were R/4 instead of 4R.

the equation is different i think, but i can't figure out what it would be.
 
If r = 4R, then r2 = 16R2, and 1/r2 = 1/(16R2)

If r = R/4, then r2 = R2/16, and 1/r2 = 16/R2.
 
hmm
i entered that in before though, and it said my answer was incorrect.

isnt there a difference for when r>=R and r<R?
 
fishys182 said:
hmm
i entered that in before though, and it said my answer was incorrect.

isnt there a difference for when r>=R and r<R?
Well, yes. When r < R, then the electron is within the nucleus and it would be interacting with a completely different and more complex charge field than outside the nucleus.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/elescat.html

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/scatele.html

Have you solved the classical EM problem for an electric field in a sphere of uniformly distributed charge and compared to the E-field outside? The nucleus is more complex.
 
Last edited:
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top