Electron Spin State and Values

Rahmuss
Messages
222
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Electron Spin State and Values

Homework Statement


An electron is in the spin state:

X = A\begin{pmatrix} 1-2i \\ 2 \end{pmatrix}

(a) Determine the constant A by normalizing X

(b) If you measured S_{z} on this electron, what values could you get, and what is the probability of each? What is the expectation value of S_{z}?


Homework Equations


S_{z} = \frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}

\left\langle S_{z}\right\rangle = \left\langle X | S_{z}X\right\rangle


The Attempt at a Solution


Part a):
A^{2}\left[ |1-2i|^{2} + |2|^{2}\right] = 1 \Rightarrow
A^{2}\left[ 1-4i+4+4\right] = 1 \Rightarrow
A^{2}\left[ 9-4i\right] = 1 \Rightarrow
A^{2} = \frac{1}{9-4i} \Rightarrow
A = \sqrt{\frac{1}{9-4i}} \Rightarrow

Part b):
For this part I'm a bit confused (thus the posting). I'm not sure what they mean when they talk about measuring S_{a} on the electron. Are they just saying, if you measured the z-component of the spin of the electron? And if so would I have something like:

\frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}1-2i \\ 2 \end{pmatrix} \Rightarrow
\frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix} 1-2i \\ -2 \end{pmatrix}

And where do I go from there? And as far as the probabilities I may be able to get that if I know the normalization constant. And I think I can get the expectation value from the normalization constant as well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any thoughts on normalizing this? I tried another way and got \frac{1}{3} and another way and I got \frac{16\hbar - 2\hbar i}{18}. And neither of those seem to work. I thought that 1/3 would work; but when I try to find the expectation value I get \frac{\hbar}{2} \frac{13}{3}.
 
Ok, I have from my teacher that A = \frac{1}{3}, and that \left\langle S_{x}\right\rangle = \frac{2\hbar}{9}.

I can normalize it and get A = \frac{1}{3}; but I can't get the correct expectation value. Here is what I am doing:

\left\langle X | S_{x}X\right\rangle = A^{2}\frac{h}{2}[(1+2i), 2]\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} (1-2i) \\ 2 \end{pmatrix} \Rightarrow

A^{2}\frac{h}{2}[(1+2i), 2][2 + (1-2i)] \Rightarrow

A^{2}\frac{h}{2}(2 + 4i + 4 + 1 + 4 + 2 -4i) = \frac{13\hbar }{18}

So what am I doing wrong? I try including the the constants during the calculations and it comes out the same:

\left\langle X | S_{x}X\right\rangle = \begin{pmatrix}\frac{(1+2i)}{3} & \frac{2}{3} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \frac{h}{2} \\ \frac{h}{2} & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} (1-2i)/3 \\ 2/3 \end{pmatrix} \Rightarrow

\frac{h}{2}\begin{pmatrix} \frac{(1+2i)}{3} & \frac{2}{3} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \frac{2}{3} & \frac{(1-2i)}{3} \end{pmatrix} \Rightarrow

\frac{h}{2}\frac{(2 + 4i + 4 + 1 + 4 + 2 -4i)}{18} = \frac{13\hbar }{18}

So, it still doesn't work. Any thoughts?
 
Rahmuss said:
Here is what I am doing:

\left\langle X | S_{x}X\right\rangle = A^{2}\frac{h}{2}[(1+2i), 2]\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} (1-2i) \\ 2 \end{pmatrix} \Rightarrow

A^{2}\frac{h}{2}[(1+2i), 2][2 + (1-2i)] \Rightarrow

A^{2}\frac{h}{2}(2 + 4i + 4 + 1 + 4 + 2 -4i) = \frac{13\hbar }{18}

A matrix times a vector is a vector, so you want:

\left\langle X | S_{x}X\right\rangle = A^{2}\frac{\hbar}{2}[(1+2i), 2]\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} (1-2i) \\ 2 \end{pmatrix} \Rightarrow

A^{2}\frac{\hbar}{2}[(1+2i), 2][2, (1-2i)] \Rightarrow

Now take the dot product of the two vectors:

A^{2}\frac{\hbar}{2}(2 + 4i + 2 - 4i) = \frac{2\hbar }{9}
 
Ah... Ok. Great! Thanks 2Tesla. That helps a lot. That makes sense now. Ok, I can see why I wasn't getting it. Thanks again.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top