I Electron wave funtion harmonic oscillator

jhonnyS
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
the electron wave function for a determined energy level, without superposition of states, decreases its frequency as the distance from the center increases. So the "oscilation" shouldn't be slower with distance from the center?
As we see in this Phet simulator, this is only the real part of the wave function, the frequency decreases with the potential, so lose energy as moves away the center.
244048

we se this real-imaginary animation in Wikipedia, wave C,D,E,F. Because with less energy, the frequency of quantum wave decreases, and the speed decreases too, the oscillation wouldn't be slower acording to frequency variation in image F for example? (the same way we see image D oscillating slower than F)
QuantumHarmonicOscillatorAnimation.gif

The desired response, without formulas, and without Schrödinger time independent ecuation, just explained

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_harmonic_oscillator
thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello jhonny, ##\quad## :welcome: ##\quad## !

jhonnyS said:
and the speed decreases too
No. CDEF are not 'moving': they are solutions of the SE consisting of solutions of the TISE times ##e^{i\omega t}##. For those ##<x(t)>=0##: the expectation value for the position is zero (i.e. constant).
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
jhonnyS said:
As we see in this Phet simulator
Your interpretation of the variations in the wave function as 'frequency' is wrong: those are (spatial) variations in the wave function, nothing else. ##\ \Psi^2\ ## is a probability density and that is fluctuating, unlike in a clssical harmonic oscillator.

Even if you hate formulas you can look at this difference between QM and classical
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top