Electrons in bubble chamber photographs?

bubblechamber
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If bubble chamber tracks are formed by charged particles leaving a trail of ions as they pass through, by knocking electrons out of atoms, then why aren't there spirals of electrons along the whole track?

Also, are the straight lines in bubble chamber photographs actually curves of a very very large radius?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Low-energetic particles have a very small curve radius - too small to get resolved.
Also, are the straight lines in bubble chamber photographs actually curves of a very very large radius?
If there is a magnetic field, they should be curves.
 
mfb said:
If there is a magnetic field, they should be curves.

So the straight lines are curves of very great momentum?
 
I don't see a way to get a (theoretical) straight line. Just curves with really large radius.
Simple example: Muons from cosmic radiation usually have an energy larger than ~10GeV. With a magnetic field of 1T, this results in a radius of ~30m or more.
 
Thank you very much!
 
bubblechamber said:
If bubble chamber tracks are formed by charged particles leaving a trail of ions as they pass through, by knocking electrons out of atoms, then why aren't there spirals of electrons along the whole track?

These "knock-on" electrons need to gain a fairly large amount of energy in order to be visible as separate tracks. It does happen sometimes.

http://teachers.web.cern.ch/teachers/archiv/HST2005/bubble_chambers/BCwebsite/gallery/gal2_12.htm

They're also called "delta rays." I saw plenty of these while working on a bubble chamber experiment as a graduate student long ago.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top