Electroscope Forces: Calculating Total Charge Applied

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the total charge applied to the electroscope, the discussion centers on understanding the forces acting on the charged spheres at a 30-degree angle from the vertical. The net force is considered to be zero, leading to the conclusion that the tangential component of the gravitational force must balance the tangential component of the Coulomb force. The calculations involve using the formula for Coulomb's force and the gravitational force, ultimately leading to a charge value of approximately 3.03 x 10^-6 C for one sphere. Since the electroscope has two charged spheres, the total charge applied is determined to be about 6.06 x 10^-6 C, which is consistent with expectations in the microcoulomb range. The discussion emphasizes the importance of force diagrams and proper component analysis in solving such problems.
thisisfudd
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
2. A large electroscope is made with "leaves" that are 78-cm-long wires with tiny 24-g spheres at the ends. When charged, nearly all the charge resides on the spheres. If the wires each make a 30 degree angle with the vertical, what total charge Q must have been applied to the electroscope? Ignore the mass of the wires.

OK, firstly, do I consider the spheres as really small point particles and ignore their mass? I want to, but I bet that's wrong. Second, do I have to set up some kind of force diagram, with tension and such? I think that is where I am stuck. Actually, I just find this problem to be extremely obnoxious. My sense is that the net force is equal to zero ... I have to admit, I have been kind of staring idly at this problem so if you have at least a hint, I would appreciate it. I understand generally how electroscopes work, but not with forces, etc. thrown in.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider just one sphere. If there is no coloumb force, what is the force which brings it to it's original vertical position? The tangential component of the gravitational force. Equate this force to the tangential component of the coloumb force.

F_c \cos(30) = mgcos (60) where

F_c = \frac{KQ^2}{r^2}
 
OK, yeah, I think I did basically what you said.

I found mg cos (60) = .024 x 9.8 x cos (60) and then multiplied that by cos (30) to get F = .136 N.

Then, I multiplied that by r^2 and divided by k, took the square root and got Q = 3.03 x 10^-6. Does that make sense? I guess it could be that small, but really I have no idea.
 
and then multiplied that by cos (30)


devide by cos (30).


Also, Your problem asks you to find the charge applied to the electroscope. So the answer would be 2Q and yes the charge is going to be in micro coloumb range.
 
K, yes, that makes sense. Thanks for your help.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top