Electrostatic Constant Written Funny

AI Thread Summary
The electrostatic constant k, valued at 9*10^9, can also be expressed as k = 1/(4*pi*e0), where e0 represents the electric permittivity of free space. This dual representation arises from historical conventions and the aim to simplify equations in electromagnetism. Using e0 in Coulomb's Law complicates the equation, while using k simplifies it, although it introduces factors of 4π in other equations. The relationship between k and e0 highlights the interconnectedness of these constants in physics. Understanding both forms is essential for applying the correct equations in different contexts.
Pupil
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
So the electrostatic constant k = 9*10^9, but I've also seen it written in my Fundamentals of Phys book (Resnick) and Wikipedia as k = 1/(4*pi*e0). Why is this? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one knows?
 
Pupil said:
So the electrostatic constant k = 9*10^9, but I've also seen it written in my Fundamentals of Phys book (Resnick) and Wikipedia as k = 1/(4*pi*e0). Why is this? Thanks.
The ε0 is a constant called the electric permittivity of free space. Read about it here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/HBASE/electric/elefie.html#c3"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The capacitance of a parallel plate air capacitor of area A and plate separation d is

C = e0 A/d

where the permittivity of free space e0 = 1/(u0 c2) = 8.85 x 10-12 Farads per meter,
and the permeability of free space is
u0 = 4 pi x 10-7 Henrys per meter
 
It's partly for historical reasons, and partly a matter of minimizing the number of equations that have factors of 4 \pi.

Using \epsilon_0 Coulomb's Law is more complicated:

F_{elec} = \frac {1} {4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac {q_1 q_2} {r^2}

but other equations like Gauss's Law and the parallel-plate capacitor equation are simple:

\vec \nabla \cdot \vec E = \frac {\rho} {\epsilon_0}

C = \frac {\epsilon_0 A}{d}

Whereas using k, Coulomb's Law is simpler:

F_{elec} = k \frac {q_1 q_2} {r^2}

but you have to insert factors of 4 \pi into other equations:

\vec \nabla \cdot \vec E = 4 \pi k \rho

C = \frac {A}{4 \pi k d}
 
Well 1/4pi*e0 is where 9x10^9 came from.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top