Electrostatic Constant Written Funny

AI Thread Summary
The electrostatic constant k, valued at 9*10^9, can also be expressed as k = 1/(4*pi*e0), where e0 represents the electric permittivity of free space. This dual representation arises from historical conventions and the aim to simplify equations in electromagnetism. Using e0 in Coulomb's Law complicates the equation, while using k simplifies it, although it introduces factors of 4π in other equations. The relationship between k and e0 highlights the interconnectedness of these constants in physics. Understanding both forms is essential for applying the correct equations in different contexts.
Pupil
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
So the electrostatic constant k = 9*10^9, but I've also seen it written in my Fundamentals of Phys book (Resnick) and Wikipedia as k = 1/(4*pi*e0). Why is this? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one knows?
 
Pupil said:
So the electrostatic constant k = 9*10^9, but I've also seen it written in my Fundamentals of Phys book (Resnick) and Wikipedia as k = 1/(4*pi*e0). Why is this? Thanks.
The ε0 is a constant called the electric permittivity of free space. Read about it here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/HBASE/electric/elefie.html#c3"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The capacitance of a parallel plate air capacitor of area A and plate separation d is

C = e0 A/d

where the permittivity of free space e0 = 1/(u0 c2) = 8.85 x 10-12 Farads per meter,
and the permeability of free space is
u0 = 4 pi x 10-7 Henrys per meter
 
It's partly for historical reasons, and partly a matter of minimizing the number of equations that have factors of 4 \pi.

Using \epsilon_0 Coulomb's Law is more complicated:

F_{elec} = \frac {1} {4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac {q_1 q_2} {r^2}

but other equations like Gauss's Law and the parallel-plate capacitor equation are simple:

\vec \nabla \cdot \vec E = \frac {\rho} {\epsilon_0}

C = \frac {\epsilon_0 A}{d}

Whereas using k, Coulomb's Law is simpler:

F_{elec} = k \frac {q_1 q_2} {r^2}

but you have to insert factors of 4 \pi into other equations:

\vec \nabla \cdot \vec E = 4 \pi k \rho

C = \frac {A}{4 \pi k d}
 
Well 1/4pi*e0 is where 9x10^9 came from.
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top