Electrostatic energy with gauss' law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field inside a uniformly charged solid sphere using Gauss's law. The electric field is derived as E=(Q*r)/(4*pi*(epsilon0)*R^3). For the integration of E^2 over spherical shells, there is confusion about the limits and whether to integrate E^2 dE or E dr. The conversation clarifies that a solid sphere with uniform charge density does have an electric field within, contrasting with conductors where the field inside is zero. Ultimately, the integration setup for spherical symmetry is confirmed as Int(4*pi r^2)dr from 0 to R, leading to a solution for the electrostatic energy contained within the sphere.
bishy
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid sphere contains a uniform volume charge density (charge Q, radius R).
(a) Use Gauss’s law to find the electric field inside the sphere.
(b) Integrate
E^2 over spherical shells over the volumes inside and outside the sphere.
(c) What fraction of the total electrostatic energy of this configuration is contained within the sphere?

Homework Equations


https://www.physicsforums.com/latex_images/13/1397427-0.png
Qenclosed = r^3/R^3
flux= 4pi*r^2*E

The Attempt at a Solution


a) E=(Q*r)/(4*pi*(epsilon0)*R^3)
b) So I am thinking for this one that I need to integrate E^2 with upper limits being inside and lower limits being the outside of the sphere. what I'm not sure is if its intergral(E^2 dE) or if a value inside of E is being integrated. R or r would make sense to intergrate as well hence intergral(E dr)
c) since I can't solve b, I can't solve c either.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not entirely sure how to prove it with gauss's law as it was a common assumption made when I use it but there is no electrical field inside a solid conductor.
 
Can you explain why? I don't think that's right. Heres why. A solid sphere has a point of symmetry where the distance from this point gives you a charge density called r. In the question it states that the charge is uniform so I expect the electric field at a distance r within a sphere to be Q (as given with the problem) given that its symmetrical. if R is the full radius of the sphere than R-r does not affect electric field due to symmetry.

Also I've found an example problem similar to this one with a given E inside a solid uniformly charged sphere within Essential University Physics by Richard Wolfson? Now I'm confused :)
 
Last edited:
it doesn't have a field only if its a conductor in which case all charge resides on the surface. This is easy to see if you consider the following: say you put some charge on one point of a sphere. The charge will immediately flow due to coulomb forces and it will flow until all charges are furthest from each-other and all forces are balanced. This happens when you have charge distributed evenly on the surface of the conductor.

However, you can have a sphere with charge density that is an insulator which will have a field in its interior.
 
Forget what I wrote here earlier (if you read it) i was thinking capacitors. But if they want you to integrate over volume using spherical shells the generic set up for something spherically symmetrical will be:

Int(4*pi r^2)dr from 0 to R.
 
Last edited:
Thanks man. Solved it with your advice.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top