Electrostatic potential due to a dipole

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the derivation of equations for electrostatic potential due to a dipole, specifically focusing on the geometry and vector addition involved. Participants express confusion over the differing signs in the equations derived from the cosine rule, with one equation featuring a negative sign and the other a positive sign. The distinction between angles theta and alpha is also debated, with clarification that alpha is the angle between the dipole direction and the line length r1. Ultimately, the resolution comes from recognizing that the cosine rule accounts for the negative sign when considering angles in different orientations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding geometric relationships in vector addition for accurate equation formulation.
Crystal037
Messages
167
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
Find the electrostatic potential due to a dipole
Relevant Equations
V=Q/4*pi*ebselon
IMG_20191209_042703_compress65.jpg

Given here is that by geometry
r1^2 =r^2 +a^2 - 2ar*cos(theta)
But if we try to do vector addition then since direction of dipole is upwards then it should be
r^2 =r1^2 +a^2 + 2ar1*cos(alpha)
Where alpha is the angle between a and r1. I Don,'t understand how they get it by geometry
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Crystal037 said:
if we try to do vector addition then since direction of dipole is upwards then it should be
r^2 =r1^2 +a^2 + 2ar1*cos(alpha)
What vectors are you adding to get that? What has the geometry of a triangle got to do with the direction of a field?
 
Then why at one equation a negative sign is present and on the other equation a positive sign is present in front of the term 2racos(theta)
 
Crystal037 said:
Then why at one equation a negative sign is present and on the other equation a positive sign is present in front of the term 2racos(theta)
I cannot answer that until you explain how you get the equation with the positive sign.
 
I didn't got it. In the book it's simply written that we got it by geometry
 
cos(α) = -cos(180° -α)
 
Crystal037 said:
I didn't got it. In the book it's simply written that we got it by geometry
You don't seem to be understanding my question.
The book gives this equation, with a negative sign, by geometry, and that is quite easily got by the cosine rule:
Crystal037 said:
r12 =r2 +a2 - 2ar*cos(theta)
Then you wrote this equation with a positive sign, and do not explain how you get it:
Crystal037 said:
But if we try to do vector addition then since direction of dipole is upwards then it should be
r2 =r12 +a2 + 2ar1*cos(alpha)
What is alpha? I don't see that in the diagram. Did you mean theta?
If you take the line of length 2a and continue that upwards, then label the angle between that and the line length r1 as alpha then both equations are correct.
 
I have taken alpha as the angle between a and r1. But I was not talking about my equation. In the book itself there are 2equations, if you see the image then you'll see that after they have written by geometry they have written 2 equations:
First is r1^2 =r^2 +a^2 - 2ar cos(theta)
Second is r2^2 =r^2 +a^2 +2arcos(theta)
Now I understood that they have taken cosine rule and cos(180-theta) =-cos(theta)
 
Back
Top