Electrostatic Potential Energy with Constant Electric Field vs NonConstant Field

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between electrostatic potential energy and electric fields, particularly contrasting scenarios involving constant and non-constant electric fields. Participants explore the conditions under which different equations for potential energy can be applied, including the implications of varying electric fields on calculations of work done by electric forces.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that potential energy can be expressed as PE = V*q = E*q*d, but questions the interchangeability of these expressions in scenarios with varying electric fields.
  • Another participant proposes that PE = E*q*d can be used in situations where a constant external electric field acts on a particle.
  • A different viewpoint raises the idea that changes in electric field and distance could yield a constant result for E*d*q, questioning the necessity of a constant electric field for using the equation.
  • One participant argues that the inability to use PE = E*q*d for calculating work between two points is due to the nature of potential energy being defined with respect to an infinite reference point, rather than solely the uniformity of the electric field.
  • Another participant clarifies that while V = E*d is valid for constant fields, a parallel plate capacitor can serve as an example where this equation applies, as long as one stays away from the edges, and notes that calculus provides a more general formulation for varying fields.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the equations for potential energy in varying electric fields. There is no consensus on the conditions under which PE = E*q*d can be used, indicating an unresolved debate on the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the assumptions of uniformity in electric fields and the reference points used for potential energy calculations. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations regarding the mathematical relationships involved.

Hereformore
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
When determining potential energy we have the relationship:

PE = V*q = E*q*d

But depending on the scenario we can't use them interchangeable right?

If you want to calculate the work needed to be done by a particle going from a distance Y to right next to another particle of the same charge, then you couldn't use PE = E*q*d since the electric field wouldn't be the same as the particle got closer and closer.

But you could use the voltage relationship here if you calculated the voltage difference between the two points.

In what situation would you be able to use the PE= E*q*d? Where there is a constant electric field between two particles? (so not between a parallel plate capacitor).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hereformore said:
In what situation would you be able to use the PE= E*q*d? Where there is a constant electric field between two particles? (so not between a parallel plate capacitor).
In situations where constant external field acts on a particle
 
Hereformore,
don't u think that with the change in the electric field, there is also a change in the distance... so the net result of E*d*q can be constant. So why do u need to have a constant electric field to use the equation ?
 
Hereformore said:
If you want to calculate the work needed to be done by a particle going from a distance Y to right next to another particle of the same charge, then you couldn't use PE = E*q*d since the electric field wouldn't be the same as the particle got closer and closer.
You cannot calculate the work of the electric force which cause the movement of a charge between two points with PE = E*q*d, not because the not uniform field, but because the work you are looking for, is the work between two points, and the PE is the work between a point and infinit.(were we set for convenience zero (Nullpunkt), and every value of potential is measured with respect to that zero)
 
Basically, your equations are the same, except that V is replaced by E*d.
That's because V = E*d, (or more conventionally, V = -E*d) for cases in which E is constant. Actually, a parallel plate capacitor is a good example of where you can use this equation, since a parallel plate capacitor has a roughly constant E field between the plates, as long as you stay away from the edges.

This should all become very clear with calculus-based physics, where V = -E*d is just a special case of
##V = -\int \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{s}##
which is valid when E is varying along the path.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K