Electrostatic Speed Experiments?

AI Thread Summary
Electrostatic and magnetostatic forces have a finite propagation speed, which is the speed of light (c). This speed is consistent across all fundamental interactions, including gravity and nuclear forces, meaning that any change at one point will be observed at another point only after a delay proportional to the distance between them. While static solutions of Maxwell's equations apply when fields are not changing, dynamic situations require consideration of the finite speed of these forces. The discussion suggests that relativity may not be necessary for analysis within a single reference frame, but the propagation speed remains a universal constant. Overall, the understanding of interaction speeds aligns with established physics principles.
ObsessiveMathsFreak
Messages
404
Reaction score
8
Does anyone know of an experiment that shows that the electrostatic and/or magnetostatic forces have a finite speed, i.e. transmission time? I think I remember reading somewhere that Hertz devised experiments that showed that one or the other or both effects had a finite transmission time.

In addition, when dealing with a finite propagation speed for these forces, is there a framework separate from special relativity, or should one begin directly from that point of view?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electrostatic or magnetostatic fields are simply the limit of Maxwell's electromagnetic equations where the fields are no longer changing in time. If you are in a situation where the fields are still propagating then they are changing in time and you cannot use the static solutions.

They propagate at the speed of light. As long as you are doing your analysis in a single reference frame you probably don't need relativity.
 
the propagation speed of both electostatic and magnetic forces is c, commonly called the "speed of light". for E&M, it really is the very same thing, by definition. but, i think the most common belief about this "c" is that it is not just the speed of the "instantaneous" electromagnetic interaction, but is the speed in nature of all "instantaneous" interactions, including gravity and nuclear interactions.

so, according to this, no matter what the fundmental interaction is, if something a point A interacts with something else at point B, if a third party that is equidistant from both points A and B can somehow observe a change in amount of "cause" at point A at some time t0 (according to that observer's clock), that observer will observe the "effect" at point B at a later time, at t0 + |locus(A)-locus(B)|/c. doesn't matter what the interaction is, that's how fast it will propagate and no matter what physical interaction someone (or some thing) might use to communicate information from one place to another, that information cannot propagate at a speed faster than c.

the real physicists may need to correct me, but i think that is the current widely accepted understanding of the speed of any force or interaction.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top