Electrostatics - find the work done

AI Thread Summary
To achieve maximum Coulombic repulsion between two charges 'q' and 'Q-q', the charge should be divided equally, resulting in q = Q/2. The work done in reducing the distance between the charges to half its initial value involves understanding the relationship between potential energy and work. The calculation of work yields a negative value when using W = U1 - U2, indicating the work done by the system, while the book presents a positive value for work done on the system. Clarifying this distinction resolves the confusion regarding the signs in the work calculation. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly interpreting potential energy changes in electrostatics.
exuberant.me
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
A certain charge 'Q' is to be divided into two parts, q and Q-q. What is the relationship of 'Q' to 'q' if the two parts, placed at a given distance 'r' apart, are to have maximum Coulombic repulsion? What is the work done in reducing the distance between them to half its value?

It went easy for the first part
as f(q) = k(q)(Q-q)/r2
and, f'(q) = 0 gives q = Q/2 which provides max repulsion (as f''(q) < 0)

But it is getting a bit "confusing" to calculate the work done for the second part..

someone please provide the idea.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the relationship between potential energy and work?
 
God.. i m kind of "fool"...
i actually got the answer.. but in the book its given in the form of 'Q' and i got it in terms of 'q'
but could not check the difference that time... got it thanks...
 
one more thing at last
W = -(U2 - U1) = U1 - U2
So in this question
applying W = (U1 - U2) gives me a negative answer
but in the book its +ve
what of that? :P
 
exuberant.me said:
W = -(U2 - U1) = U1 - U2
That would be the work done by the system in going from U1 to U2. You want the work done on the system.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top