Electrostatics Line Charge question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the electric field above a line segment with a uniform line charge. A participant expresses confusion about the constant nature of the line charge density (λ) and its apparent disappearance in the solution. Others suggest that the participant should clarify their equations and use LaTeX for better readability. The importance of separating horizontal and vertical components of the electric field is emphasized, along with the need to correctly handle vector magnitudes in integrals. Ultimately, the participant resolves their confusion after recognizing a notation error.
grandpa2390
Messages
473
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


Find the Electric field a distance z above one end of a straight line segment of length L that carries a uniform line charge λ

Homework Equations


Complicated formula due to lack of font for the notation used by the author of the book. so I wrote it out. I did my best to differentiate between the script r and pi.

just in case I did a terrible job, only the first "r" is pi, the rest are script r's

The Attempt at a Solution



My professor says during the lecture while doing this problem that the λ is not dependent on r so is a constant and can be pulled out of the integral, but then it also just disappears from the problem completely.

Why?

dAlJSvp.jpg


BTkRP2B.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your working is hard to read. It would be better if you typed the equations. You can use LaTeX.
https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/
grandpa2390 said:
but then it also just disappears from the problem completely.
It shouldn't.
You need to first find the horizontal and vertical components of the field separately.
 
grandpa2390 said:
but then it also just disappears from the problem completely.
Did your professor say that, or is it something you observe? It is still there in your final equation.
 
Inside your integral there is a vector and it's magnitude is not 1 (as one can see in the drawing) so this magnitude will be there multiplying the argument and that is not right. You should be carefull when solving the integral.

Sorry i didn't see the hat over the u. That indicates that it is a unity vector.
 
nvm
I got it.
 
Last edited:
sry
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top