Electrostatics - Negative charge in sphere

jacobrhcp
Messages
164
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a metal grounded sphere of radius R in vacuum has a negative charge inside at a distance a from the centre. a) Draw the e-field in the sphere, b) find the force on the charge, c) and determine the maximal and minimal surface charge density, d) as well as the magnitude of the charge on the in,- and outside of the sphere, when we change the surface potential from zero to V.

The Attempt at a Solution



I did a-b-c, and I don't know d yet.

a-b:

I was thinking Image charges here.

if I put a charge q' = q \frac{b}{R} at distance b=\frac{R^{2}}{a} from the centre in a straight line from the centre and charge q, the potential is zero on the surface, just like in the problem. the first uniqueness theorem now tells me that the potential inside the sphere is uniquely determined.

The second uniquess theorem tells me the E-field is uniquely determined, because the total charge on the sphere is given (=0).

The force is now just a matter of putting symbols in formulas.

c: the surface charge is minimal/maximal on the places of the sphere closest and furthest from the image charge. So \nabla E = \frac{\rho}{e_0} and you compute \rho

But what is the total charge when the potential is changed?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
"because the total charge on the sphere is given (=0)."

When the sphere is grounded, the total surface charge on the inner surface of the spherical shell must be the negative of the charge q. This is because V=0, means E=0 just outside. By Gauss's law the net charge must be zero.
If the sphere's surface is at V, E just outside equals V/R.
Gauss's law will then give the charge on the outer surface of the sphere.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top