Electrostatics - point charges and work

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work required to bring two point charges, 3.0 μC and 9.0 μC, from an infinite distance to specified coordinates. The relevant formula for calculating the force between the charges is F = k(q1)(q2)/r^2, where k is the electrostatic constant. The distance between the charges is determined to be 6 mm, as they are positioned at x = 3 mm and x = -3 mm. The work done in this context is equivalent to the energy stored in the system, calculated using the formula U = k_e q_1 q_2/r. The final answer for the work done is confirmed to be 41 J.
HenryHH
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Electrostatics -- point charges and work

Homework Statement



A 3.0 μC point charge and a 9.0 μC point charge are initially infinitely far apart. How much work
does it take to bring the 3.0 μC point charge to x = 3.0 mm, y = 0.0 mm and the 9.0 μC point charge to x = -3.0 mm, y = 0.0 mm? (The value of k is 9.0 × 109 N∙m2/C2.)

q1 = 3.0 uC, q2 = 9.0 uC, k = 9.0 × 109 N∙m2/C2

Homework Equations



F = k(q1)(q2)/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the answer is 41 J (this is just a practice problem). I'm assuming that the formula F = k(q1)(q2)/r^2 is supposed to be used because I have values for most variables, but I'm not sure what the radius would be. If one point charge is at x = 3mm and the other point charge is at x = -3mm, then is the radius 6 mm (I got this value by counting along the x-axis)? Also, how would the answer end up being in Joules?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


When two discrete charges are brought together, the amount of work one has to do is just the energy which gets stored in the system. Energy stored for two charges is

U=\frac{k_e q_1 q_2}{r}

where r is the distance between the two charges. Using the coordinates of the two charges given, you can find the distance between them. Since work done is same as the energy
transfer, it has the same unit as the energy
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top