Electrostatics problem inslator and a conductor problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two infinite sheets of charge and a conducting plate, with specific surface charge densities provided. The user attempts to calculate the electric field at the origin using superposition but arrives at an incorrect value, prompting confusion about the role of the conducting plate. They express uncertainty about how to account for the charge redistribution on the conductor and its effect on the overall electric field. The user seeks clarification on the correct approach to determine the electric field and the surface charge density on the right side of the conducting plate. The thread highlights the complexities of applying electrostatic principles in this scenario.
koab1mjr
Messages
105
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A. Two infinite thin sheets of charge are placed perpendicular to the x axis. The surface charge densities of the two plates are (SC density 1 = 8.5 C/M2) and (SC density 2 = 1.5 C/M2. Placed near plate 2 is a think conducting metal plate with a (SC density of -3.0 C/M) Find the magnitude of the field at the origin

problem has a diagram

d = 60 cm

plate 1 (2d space separation) origin (d space separation) plate of thickness d (d space separation) plate 2

B. what is the surface charge density on the right side of the conducting plate?

Homework Equations



The only equation needed is the E field formula for infinite plates which is surface charge density/ 2 * permitivity constant



The Attempt at a Solution


a.
I was applying superposition to this problem realizing that the conductor will be a different formula of surface charge density/ permitivity constant. With this route I got 4.802e11N/C for plate 1 E field, 8.47e10N/C for plate 2's e field and 3.389e11N/C for the conducting plate. Adding them together gave me 2.26e11N/C. The correct answer is 5.65e11N/C. I noticed that if i disregard the plate all together it works out but it might be a coincidence and I do not understand why which is why I am posing the question on the board.


The conducting plate is generating a field and I know the charges will shift to respond to the charged plate to the right of it. But its stronger than that plate and should still be generating a field. Not sure why you would just ignore it any help would be much appreciated.

b.
Since I have been stuck on part a.
no clue on how to break this down but I assume its having the conductor shift charge to keep its center neutral but I am not sure how to go about doing that. I tried calculating the net field experienced by the plate in the center. Not sure if this is correct
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am assuming my lack of response is for the lack of the equations and stuff


[..P..]------------------------[...Con...]-----------[..P..]
[..l...]------------------------[..ducting...]-----------[..l...]
[..a..]------------------------[...metal...]------------[.a...]
[..t...]------------------------[...p...]------------[..t...]
[..e..]------------------------[...l...]------------[..e..]
[...]------------------------[...a...]------------[...]
[...] ------2d-------*---d---[...t...]----d-------[...]
[.1...]------------------------[...e...]------------[..2..]
[...]------------------------[.....]------------[...]
[...]------------------------[.....]------------[...]
[...]------------------------[----d-----]------------[...]


\sigma1 = 8.5 C/m2
\sigma2 = 1.5 C/m2
\sigmametal plate = -3.0 C/m2
d = 60 cm

Work Formulas

E = sigma[\tex] / 2 epsilon <sub>0</sub> &lt;-----For Insulating plate<br /> E = sigma[\tex] / epsilon &lt;sub&gt;0&lt;/sub&gt; &amp;lt;----- For Conducting plate &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; hopefully this is a little better I need to find the field strength at point * and I need to find the \sigma&lt;sub&gt;right side of metal plate&lt;/sub&gt;
 
Last edited:
I am sure this problem is within the realm of ability the homework helpers here. Yet no one has answered. If there is an issue with it please let me know what it is and I will try and fix it.

Not sure why no one has answered I have seen post addressed within the hour

what gives!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top