What is the distance to the nucleus when the particle's velocity is zero?

  • Thread starter Thread starter photon_mass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the distance to a nucleus when a charged particle is projected towards it with a specific kinetic energy. The participant attempts to derive the equations governing the motion of the particle under the influence of the Coulomb force, recognizing that the force is position-dependent. They express confusion over the calculations and the application of Newton's second law in this context. The concept of the distance of closest approach is introduced, indicating that this distance occurs when the particle's kinetic energy equals the electrostatic potential energy. The participant acknowledges a misunderstanding of the original question, seeking further clarification on the calculations involved.
photon_mass
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
potential = 0
particle of mass m charge q is projected with kinetic energy K at a nucleus mass M charge Q that is at rest. it is shot with 'perfect aim' (along the x axis).
find the distance x to the nucleus when dx/dt of particle is zero.

i know that F = dK/dt = cqQ/x^2 where c = 1/4pi(epsillon naught)

.5m(d/dt)v^2 = cqQ/x^2 (1)

the coulomb force is position dependent force, so:

.5m(dv^2/dx)(dx/dt) = cqQ/x^2 (2)

.5m(dv^3) = cqQ(dx/x^2) (3)

this doesn't make any sense to me. it makes more sense to take the time derivative in (1) just giving Newtons 2nd, and then doing the position dependence.

ma = cqQ/x^2

mvdv = cqQ(dx/x^2)
.5mv^2 = -cqQ/x

and then ?

i got nothing. any suggestions, clarifications or anything of the like would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The distance of closest approach is attained when the kinetic energy of the particle wholly equals the electrostatic potential energy of the system constituted by the nucleus and particle. If you are unclear about the calculations and the sense they ought to make, look this up: Distance of Closest Approach.
 
oh geez. i read the question wrong.
thank you.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top