Explain Electron's Speed for Probing Nucleus

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the de Broglie equation to determine whether fast-moving or slow-moving electrons are better for probing atomic nuclei. It highlights that faster electrons have shorter wavelengths, which allows them to resolve smaller features within the nucleus. The consensus is that higher energy electrons are more effective for probing due to their ability to reveal finer details. The conversation clarifies misconceptions about the relationship between electron speed and probing capability. Ultimately, faster-moving electrons are deemed superior for nuclear probing.
rojasharma
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Use the de Broglie equation to explain which is better probe of the contents of the nucleus--a fast-moving electron, or a slow-moving electron. Can someone simplify what the qestion is asking for?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Compare the wavelength of higher and lower energy electrons. Now consider which would be better to probe the very small nuclei of elements. That's it really, which is best.
 
so the faster it is ...shorter the wavelength ...the faster moving electron will be helpful to probe the nucleus...
 
Indeed, the smaller the wavelength, the smaller the features it can resolve.
 
I always thought it was the other way around
 

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Similar threads

Electrons and their little role in nuclear physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Beam current of positrons and electrons
Replies
5
Views
2K
De Broglie wavelength of electron and proton
Replies
14
Views
3K
Closest approach of alpha particle - two separate methods
Replies
4
Views
1K
Accelerating electrons and positrons
Replies
8
Views
2K
Probing Nuclei with Electron Scattering
Replies
1
Views
2K
De Broglie wavelength of an electron
Replies
3
Views
3K
What factors determine wattage of electrons flowing through a wire?
Replies
8
Views
1K
Are electrons constantly orbiting around the nucleus in an atom?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Rutherford's Experient proved the nucleus is dense
Replies
11
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top